I am confused with unique_ptr and rvalue move philosophy. Let\'s say we have two collections: std::vector<std::auto_ptr<int>> autoCollection;
I just discovered the concept of an auto_ptr and am liking it! As Qt often requires a QList or QVector<(some QObject or QWidget) *>, is there any concrete reason why auto_ptr should be avoided. If
I\'m trying to use smart pointers such as auto_ptr, shared_ptr. However, I don\'t know how to use it in this situation.
Code snippet (normal pointer) int *pi = new int; int i = 90; pi = &i; int k = *pi + 10; cout<<k<<endl;
Consider the following code: #include <iostream> #include <memory> #include <vector> using namespace std;
I read here about std::auto_ptr<>::operator= Notice however that the left-hand side object is not automatically
#include <stdlib.h> #include <iostream> #include <memory> #include \"copy_of_auto_ptr.h\"
is the following funct开发者_Python百科ion OK: void DoSomething(auto_ptr< … >& a)....
Will auto_ptr be deprecated in incoming C++ standard? Should unique_ptr be used for ownership transfer instead of shared_ptr?
I come from a managed world and c++ automatic memory management is quite unclear to me I开发者_JAVA技巧f I understand correctly, I encapsulate a pointer within a stack object and when auto_ptr become
加载中,请稍侯......