I need to obtain auto_ptr from shared_ptr in my code. I can do reverse operation - convert auto_ptr to shared_ptr as shared_ptr has such constructor:
Occasionally, for fleeting moments, I think auto_ptr is cool.But most of the time I recognize that there are much simpler techniques that make it irrelevant.For example, if I want to have an object fr
I saw the following code, #include <new> #include <memory> using namespace std; class Fred;// Forward declaration
As a followup to Class containing auto_ptr stored in vector, I believe the unstated conclusion there is that it is OK to use classes with an auto_ptr member as container elements, so long as both copy
Can you tell me what is wrong with this piece of code? I got asked this in an inte开发者_如何学JAVArview and I am not sure what\'s wrong with it
Besides all the known benefits of using auto_ptrs, what are auto_ptr \"worst-practices\"? Creating STL contrainers of auto_ptrs.
Consider the following example code which I have recently seen in our code base: void ClassA::ExportAnimation(auto_ptr<CAnimation> animation)
EDIT: I should\'ve mentioned, I was looking at the documentation for Boost\'s ptr_sequence_adapter and it claims that their adapter for template< class U > void push_back( ::std::auto_ptr<U&g
pl开发者_如何学Pythonease can anybody explain this code from C++ Reference site: #include <iostream>
If I have a class template <typename T> struct C { ... private: auto_ptr<T> ptr; 开发者_如何学运维};
加载中,请稍侯......