I have a VC++ 2010 solution with multiple project, one of which is a .lib produced by my desire to put some common code in a single place.
Since the dynamically linked libraries have to be resolved at run-time, are statically linked executables faster than dynamically li开发者_StackOverflow中文版nked executables?Static linking produces a
There is a problem, app still need MSVCR100.dll and MSVCR100.dll. Build QT source: set QMAKESPEC=win32-msvc2010
I have a simple openGL D program that compiles, but I can\'t get it to link with libglut.a.I\'ve tried a few different command lines:
Currently my visual studio is basically generating Engine.dll and Game.exe Engine.dll links to some other basic libraries like:
I have a problem with getting compiled an wxWidget-application. I have installed the latest version of the library as follows:
My distribution (Arch Linux) recently increased the minimum supported Linux ke开发者_如何学编程rnel version for its toolchain. I am compiling a web application that I link statically and then upload t
I have an interface with which I want to be able to statically link modules. For example, I want to be able to call all functions (albeit in seperate files) called FOO or that match a certain prototyp
I\'m trying to compile boost and mongodb. I want 64bit versions, shared libs and dynamic linking to the runtime.
i have created a kernel module that uses kernel level functions such as vfs_read, write etc. This module has a makefile that builds this module to get the .ko file. I want to analyze the objdump outpu
加载中,请稍侯......