I believe the concept of a code-cache (for example ccache) should be extended into a more fine-grained memoization of both intermediate code (IC) and target code (TC) in compilers such as GCC or LLVM+
SPOILERS: I\'m working on http://www.spoj.pl/problems/KNAPSACK/ so don\'t peek if you don\'t want a possible solution spoiled for you.
I\'m trying to find a good way to memoize a function for only part of its domain (non-negative integers) in Haskell, using Data.MemoCombinators.
I have noticed several individuals comment on how their use of ||= to perform memoization was \'sloppy\' but they did it anyway \'because they w开发者_JAVA技巧ere in a rush\'.
Say I a method to create a dictionary from the given parameters: def newDict(a,b,c,d): # in reality this method is a bit more complex, I\'ve just shortened for the sake of simplicity
I know this is heresy, but I tried to translate the examples from http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Memoization to Java. So far I have:
I know that memoization seems to be a perennial topic here on the haskell tag on stack overflow, but I think this ques开发者_运维技巧tion has not been asked before.
((Please forgive me that I ask more than one question in a single thread. I think they are related.))
Would this memoization be faster than just creating the DbProviderFactory every time? I don\'t know if the thread locks would be slower than just creating the DbProviderFactory every time.
What is the difference between m开发者_JAVA技巧emoization and dynamic programming? I think dynamic programming is a subset of memoization. Is it right?Relevant article on Programming.Guide: Dynamic pr
加载中,请稍侯......