Imagine you\'d like to write a program that tests functions in a c++ dll file. You should enable the user to select a dll (we assume we are talking about c++ dlls).
Is the fastcall calling convention really faster than other calling conventions, such as cdecl? Are there any benchmarks out there that show how perform开发者_运维知识库ance is affected by calling con
The return value of a function is usually stored on the stack or in a register. But for a large structure, it has to be on the stack. How much copying has to happen in a real compiler for this code? O
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. Th开发者_运维技巧is question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical andcannot be reasonably answered in its current form.
I\'ve to do an interface (say, a wrapper) that allow a call from X86_64 assembly code using his calling convention to C function, with other calling convention. The best thing would be to be pretty \"
When, if ever, is it faster to pass arguments as arguments to a static method rather than have the method be non-static and access the same values via instance members.Assume the method accesses these
加载中,请稍侯......