As is suggestedelsewhere, I am using redirectMode = Resp开发者_如何学ConseRewrite in my custom error configuration so my custom error page can access the exception info. This has worked like a charm f
We all know that using Exception Handling to control your program\'s logical flow is bad. That is, you would never do:
I\'m running some code through FxCop and am currently looking at clearing all of the non-breaking violations.
My goal here is to get stack trace information from a dynamically loaded assembly.If the dynamically loaded assembly just throws the error back to the caller, the stack trace information doesn’t tell
I believe that in properly coded systems - errors (as errors or exceptions) should not be possible (with the exception of a DB/memcached server going down causing a query to fail). Our code should not
Disclosure: the code I\'m working on is for university coursework. Background: The task I\'m trying to complete is to report on the effect of different threading techniques. To do this I have written
As of the MSDN spec, CloseHandle throws an Exception if an invalid handle is passed to it when it runs under a debugger.
I have an orchestration that uses a request response port to call to a web service and wait for a response.
Here are two previous questions regarding this topic: Catch multiple Exceptions at once? More Elegant Exception Handling Than Multiple Catch Blocks?
I have a spring mvc application and we run tests with it using jetty. Sometimes the loading of the context totally fails, because bad xml or because Class Not Found exception or because a bean throws
加载中,请稍侯......