Is this good practice? Or should I just replace the code block between { and } with a function? It could be reusable (I admit) but my only motivation for doing this is to deallocate cols开发者_如何学P
(I modified the orig开发者_JS百科inal question to be more meaningful) With respect to return statement, are Raii object destroyed before/after/between return statement?
At my work we recently finished the system architecture for a control application which has a maximum latency of roughly one to two seconds. It is distributed on small ARM on-chip boxes communicating
How should an error during resource deallocation be handled, when the object representing the resource is contained in a shared pointer?
I would like to write an object generator for a templated RAII class -- basically a function template to construct an object using type deduction of parameters so the types don\'t have to be specified
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We have a large body of native C++ code, compliled into DLLs. Then we have a couple of dlls containing C++/CLI proxy code to wrap the C++ interfaces.
Say I have a resource (e.g. a filehandle or network socket) which has to be freed: open my $fh, \"<\", \"filename\" or die \"Couldn\'t open filename: $!\";
paul221 2022-04-24 18:00 你说的是貔貅吧一摸貔貅头，一世不用愁； 二摸貔貅口，万事永无忧； 三摸貔貅眼，邪魔即吓散； 四摸貔貅鼻，良缘快会?； 五摸貔貅角，平安又快乐； 六摸貔貅手，横财好就手； 七摸貔
Macros are fine. Templates are fine. Pretty much whatever it works is fine. The example 开发者_JAVA技巧is OpenGL; but the technique is C++ specific and relies on no knowledge of OpenGL.
加载中,请稍侯......