I have 2 scenarios. This fails: class F<X> { public X X { get; set; } } error CS0102: The type \'F<X>\' already contains a definition for \'X\'
Sorry my English is bad. I hope you can get what I want. I have lots of *.sql files that I want to write a program to compile them and inform me if there is any issues (problems or mistakes).
I know that if I have a block of code I don\'t want compiled when in release mode I can wrap that code block in:
I am using rad studio 2010 cpp builder. I\'ve created a new SDI application, added a TCppWebBrowser control and a simple button that onclick trigger the .navigate for the TCppWebBrowser, I compiled it
I\'m trying to compile a wireless network card driver for my Linux box and I ran into a problem with the Make command. During the compilation process I norm开发者_运维百科ally see warnings on some of
I\'ve used Reflection.Emit in the past to write a compiler, but I know the standard compilers don\'t use it, and 开发者_如何学运维in an answer to another question here I saw a mention that there are s
I understand the reasons for compiler/interpreter language extensions but why is behaviour that has no valid definition allowed to fail silently/do weird things rather then throwing a compiler error?
I want to be notified when a build has been completed\\failed in visual studio and I DO NOT want to use pre\\post build steps, I want an external process or VS plugin that will count the number of bui
I would like to define a type implementing a certain interface, however I would only implement it in a proxy at runtime. I can see two obstacles in this scenario :
I\'m trying to turn some of the programs in gera\'s Insecure Programming by example into client/server applications that could be used in capture the flag scenarios to teach exploit development. The p
加载中,请稍侯......