I\'m having a problem unit testing a class which fires events when a thread starts and finishes.A cut down version of the offending source is as follows:
If a servlet is not thread safe, then does that mean that all objects created and referenced during the servlet lifecycle are not thread safe? Maybe I\'m not quite getting this, but in Web application
I asked a question about building custom Thread Safe Generic List now I am trying to unit test it and I absolutely have no idea how to do that. Since the lock happens inside the ThreadSafeList class I
I am a threading noob and I am trying to write a custom thread safe generic list cla开发者_如何学Pythonss in C# (.NET 3.5 SP1). I\'ve read Why are thread safe collections so hard?. After reviewing the
I am writing a cataloging application that parses through and extracts information from files and stores the information from each file in an object instance. In addition to the data extracted from th
I have a class that maintains a private Dictionary instance that caches some data. The class writes to the dictionary from multiple threads using a ReaderWriterLockSlim.
Now from what I understand under Perl ithreads all data is private unless explicitly shared. I want to write a function which stores per thread state between calls.I assume that a side effect of all
Given: class Foo { Foo() {}; }; class Bar { static int counter; Bar() { ++counter; } } It\'s clear that Foo::F开发者_运维技巧oo is thread safe whereas Bar::bar is not.
We added DynamicProxy to our ASP.NET web app a couple of weeks ago. The code ran fine in dev and QA, but when we pushed to production, we got the following exception (top of stack trace only):
I have two threads, and I want to make sure I am doing the synchronization correctly on the LinkedBlockingQueue..Is this correct?Or is the explicit synchronization on (messageToCommsQueue) not necessa
加载中,请稍侯......