I have a question concerning the use of boost::lock_guard (or similar scoped locks) and using variables that should be protected by the lock in a return statement.
How do I control when a thread is permitted to access an object and when it is not. For example, if I have situation like below, I want to make sure that when I am doing something with objFoo in my B
How do I make code like this thread safe? public static class Converter { public static string ConvertNameToNickname(string name)
Specifically I\'m talking about Python. I\'m trying to hack something (just a little) by seeing an object\'s value without ever passing it in, and I\'m wondering if it is thread safe to use thread loc
I\'m writing a unit test with Boost.Unit, and I would like to include basic tests for deadlocks in the code I\'m testing. My first idea was to set a deadline timer in one thread while running the test
This is a two part question. First, let\'s say that I have a function that is executing in a another thread:
Can more than one thread safely call methods on an instance of Scheduler returned by the 开发者_运维问答StdSchedulerFactory concurrently?I had this problem so thought I\'d look at the source code. Ass
I\'m having problems with the above much asked-about error. We have a TCP/IP server application which has been working fine for some years. I now need to allow the application to accept connections fr
I use very often RIA WCF Services and I inject the same context in several ViewModel. My problem is that as you know, the context of RIA Services, is not thread safe.
Is it true that if I only use immu开发者_如何学编程table data type, my Java program would be thread safe?
加载中,请稍侯......