So I just learned about the volatile keyword while writing some examples for a section that I am TAing tomorrow. I wrote a quick program to demonstrate that the ++ and -- operations are not atomic.
This question already has answers here: Closed 12 years ago. Possible Duplicates: Is the C++ STL std::set thread-safe?
I understood that calling boost::asio::ip::tcp::socket::async_receive (or boost::asio::ip::tcp::socket::async_send) two times may result in a bad behavior..
As an addition to my current application, I need to create a separate thread which will periodically do some processing
I\'ve got a very weird behavior, in my java (spring) application, I\'ve a case where i save an object using hibernateTemplate, then calling a thread which try to get this object again using hibernateT
I was wondering, if i have a multi-core processor and i have multiple threads,is it possible that the program will crash if 2 or more threads access a variable at the same time? How can i block tempor
Is there a way in objective C that I can define a static int that is thread safe? f开发者_开发百科or example if I have class called Session that has:
Is the following Thead Safe in java? public class TestDCL{ private static final Semaphore lock = new Semaphore(1);
I know there are lot of ways to implement a thread safe singleton pattern like (Double Check Locking , static readonly method, lock method) but i just tried below code
开发者_JS百科 It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical andcannot be reasonably answered in its current form. F
加载中,请稍侯......