I think this is a stupid question, but I can\'t quite find the answer I\'m looking for in the JMS getting started guide, or indeed elsewhere on the web. This jGuru post suggests that thread safety in
private object lockObj = new object(); private Dictionary<int, string> dict = new Dictionary<int, string>();
This question pertains to writing a massively scalable & efficient customer sessionstate class library in C# and I am in desperate need of sage counsel.
I have a list of personId. There are two API calls to update it (add and remove): public void add(String newPersonName) {
If a Queue is syncronized: var _item = Queue.Synchronized(new Queue()); can I call methods like Enqueue and Dequeue on it without using lock statements?
I am building a small tool that will need to open a thread, and let the thread do its thing, no matter what happens on that thread I don\'t want it to interfere with the main app, just execute, handle
I\'m storing DataTable in ASP .NET Cache property. Operations that开发者_如何学JAVA can be done on that DataTable are:
Is this code thread safe? MyModel.skip_callback(:save, :before, :my_callback) my_model_instance.update_attributes(attributes)
Given, that add method defination in ArrayList is as follows :- public boolean add(E e) { ensureCapacity(size + 1);// Increments modCount!!
开发者_StackOverflow中文版The MSDN documentation for MemoryCache.Set unfortunately doesn’t state explicitly whether it is thread-safe or not.
加载中,请稍侯......