I use F# a lot. All the basic collections in F# implement IEumberable interface, thus it is quite natural to access them using the single Seq module in F#. Is this possible in OCaml?
I\'m interested in using OCaml for a project, however I\'m not sure about where its parallelizatio开发者_运维技巧n capabilities are anymore.Is there a message passing ability in OCaml?Is OCaml able to
I have defined a type like that: type s_program = { globals : s_var list; main: s_block; } and s_var = { s_var_name: string;
I am writing a compiler in Ocaml. I want to realize something like that: program test; var a,b : boolean;
I cannot compile an extremely simple ocaml program test2.ml open Test1 print_string \" Hello \" with test1.ml containing only 1 line
I am writing a compiler of mini-pascal in Ocaml. I would like my compiler to accept the following code for instance:
I am doing an exercise of a free course. The following ocaml code compiles when I \"make\", but it complains once I am trying to put it into toplevel. Why?
I\'m trying to write small utilities to get used to Unix programming with OCaml. Here\'s my try for cat:
I am wondering if it is possible to debug/execute a Ocaml program step by step, for instance like debugging C++ programs in Visual Studio. In other words, I would like to run a Ocaml program line by l
I am writing a compiler in Ocaml with Emacs. I am told that with -annot a file .annot could be generated while compiling, which could help Emacs to show the type of my code. But it is odd that no .ann