I would like to print some rectangles one by one in a terminal like that: 4 57 8 25 3: bool6: int Which represents that, given an array a, the zone from a([2,3], [4,5]) is bool and the zone from a
I am wondering if there exists already some naming conventions for Ocaml, especially for names of constructors, names of variables, names of functions, and names for labels of record.
I have defined a function like the following: let ff (f1: a_function) (f2: a_function) (v0: type1) (v1: type2): type3 = ...
I often need to declare a type which contains a map or a list, for instance: type my_type_1 = my_type_0 IntMap.t
I wonder why in OCaml, let ... and does not have the same kind of scoping as type ... and. The following one is OK, t2 is in the same scope as t1:
What I want to do I have a computationally intensive OCaml application and I\'d like it to run in the background without disturbing normal computer usage. I\'d like to present the users with two opti
I notice that included in the source of the OpaWhiteBoard example, there is a .ml file he开发者_如何转开发re:
I have a simple function that prints a string and exits: let fatal s = print_string \"Log: \"; print_endline s;
printf, fprintf, etc. : all accept the %a conversion. The manual says for %a: \"user-defined printer. Takes two arguments and apply the first one to outchan (the current output channel) and to the
For [1]: # let make pair int (x:int) (y:int) = x,y ;; val make_pair_int : int -> int -> int * int = <fun>
加载中,请稍侯......