I am writing a WinForms application to migrate a lot of data.The new system is web-based and uses ASP.NET membership API.
Can a failed — with \"transaction collision\" — write operation to an entity overwrite changes made to the same entity on the other successfully committed transaction?
i recently ran into the surprising behaviour of EF4, where after adding an entity to a context it is not available for querying (well, you need to make your queries aware, that you might be searching
Facing a strange problem here, below is the configuration i am using: 1. Apache Tomcat 6.0.26 2. mySql 3. Spring framework+ Hibernate
I\'m using ORMLite in my Android project. I know that Sqlite takes care of the file level locking. Many threads can read, one can write. Locks prevent more than one writing.
This thought just occurred to me, and I have no idea if it\'s crazy or not.No examples I\'ve found online are set up this way.I\'m building a wrapper around MySQLi (or maybe PDO) and I\'m just in the
I have a (for me) strange problem. I try to lock a set of tables for a transaction that I am trying to do. But for some reason at least one of my tables wont lock.
I have a WinForms project where i have to read massive xml-files (2gb+) and store the data in a MSSQL database.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
We want to switch from MyISAM to InnoDB for several reasons, but we do not intend to use transactions with BEGIN/COMMIT etc.
加载中,请稍侯......