I can so开发者_如何学运维rt a int* array using stl, plain and simple like std::sort(myarray, myarray + size);
I have always been an embedded software engineer, but usually at Layer 3 or 2 of the OSI stack. I am not really a hardware guy. I have generally always done telecoms products, usually hand/cell-phones
Maybe I am missing something completely obvious, but I can\'t figure out why one would use back_inserter/front_inserter/inserter,
I\'m having an issue where using vector.push_back(value) is overwriting the final value, rather than appending to the end.Why might this happen?I have a sample item in the vector, so it\'s size never
#inc开发者_高级运维lude <iostream> #include <cstring> #include <string> template <typename T>
While working on some graphics code a while back, I wrote Rect and Region classes using ints as the underlying coordinate holder, and that worked fine. The Region was implemented as a simple class ext
I wrote a class that wraps an iterator and returns transformed values on demand: // iterator-wrapper.h
I have written those few line: #include <vector> #include <algorithm> #include <stdlib.h>
I have the followin开发者_JAVA百科g code: struct Node { int a; int b; }; Node node; node.a = 2; node.b = 3;
I noticed in Effective STL that vector is the type of sequence that should be used by default. What\'s does it mean? It seems that ignore the efficiency vector can do anything.
加载中,请稍侯......