Ruby 1.8 uses userspace threads, not operating system threads. This means that Ruby 1.8 can only utilize a single CPU core no matter how many Ruby threads you create.
I think I\'m in a problem. I have two TCP apps connected to each other which use winsock I/O completion ports to send/receive data (non-blocking sockets).
I understand that they work in some way distinct from making a thread per u开发者_StackOverflowser. How exactly does that work?
I\'m using .net 3.5 named pipes and my server side is : serverPipeStream = new NamedPipeServerStream(\"myPipe\", PipeDirection.InOut, 1, PipeTransmissionMode.By开发者_StackOverflow中文版te, PipeOptio
I\'ve got a fairly cpu-intensive application, but all of the cpu-intensive stuff is started by clicking a QPushButton. When the button is clicked, a hidden QLabel is show()n.
I don\'t understand what problem these frameworks solve.Are they replacements for a HTTP server like Apache HTTPD, Tomcat, Mongrel, etc?Or are they more?Why might I use them... some real world example
I have a file descriptor that is open for reading which may be non-blocking. What I need to do is simply read all data until reaching EOF and write that data to a writable file descriptor. As the proc
From what I have been reading on The Open Group website on fcntl, open, read, and write, I get the impression that whether O_NONBLOCK is set on a file descriptor, and hence whether non-blocking I/O is
I am trying to use FileLock lock(long position, long size,boolean shared) in FileChannel object As per the javadoc it can throw OverlappingFileLockException. When I create a test program with 2 th
Long-delayed update I\'m accepting MUG4N\'s answer to this question, and I also want to respond to some of the criticisms that were raised against it.
加载中,请稍侯......