Applicatives compose, monads don\'t. What does the above state开发者_运维问答ment mean? And when is one preferable to other?If we compare the types
Let\'s say I defined in F# the following two types: type Dog = { DogName:string; Age:int } type Cat = { CatName:string; Age:int }
I have some GADT which开发者_运维百科 represents a term in the lambda-calculus. data Term a = Var a
var recurse = function(steps, data, delay) { if(steps == 0) { console.log(data.length) } else { setTimeout(function(){
As I got a lot of spare time to spend ATM I read a few threads/comments on code-comments and documentation here.
I 开发者_JAVA技巧see a lot of functional programming related topics mention destructive updates. I understand that it is something similar to mutation, so I understand the update part. But what is the
One of the advantages of not handling collections through indices is to avoid off-by-one errors. That\'s certainly not the only advantage, but it is one of them.
I\'m using functions instead of classes, and I find that I can\'t tell when another function that it relies on is a dependency that should be individually unit-tested or an internal implementation det
Can anybody give a clear explanation? What is a wholemeal programming in functional programming area. All I\'ve found is that wholemeal is a
New to F#. The following question may make no sense at all. // an attempt at Huffman encoder let encodeValue x y = function ...
加载中,请稍侯......