To keep things simplified lets say I have an interface RandomProvider interface public interface RandomProvider
Why a开发者_StackOverflow中文版re copy constructors unnecessary for immutable objects? Please explain this for me.Because the value cannot change, it\'s every bit as good to reference the same object
I have been reading this question and a few other answers and whilst I get the difference between changing the reference and changing the state of the current instance I\'m not certain why this means
This question already has answers here: 开发者_如何学C Why can't strings be mutable in Java and .NET?
I have read in many places that exposing fields publicly is not a good idea, because if you later want to change to properties, you will have to recompile all the code which uses your class.
I have been trying to wrap my head around this FXC开发者_高级运维op violation \"DoNotDeclareReadOnlyMutableReferenceTypes\"
This is a follow-up now that Scala 2.8.0 be开发者_运维知识库ta is out to this question: What is a proper way to manage flexible, typed, immutable data structures in Scala?
So we all realize the benefits of immutable types, particularly in multithreaded scenarios.(Or at least we should all realize that; see e.g. System.String.)
What tools/libraries exist that will take a struct and automatically generate an immutable wrapper and also a \"builder\" class for incrementally building new instances?
I heard F# has native support for immutability but what about it that can not be replicated in C#? What do you get by an F# immutable data that you don\'t get from a C# immutable data?
加载中,请稍侯......