In short, my question is: If you have class, MyClass<T>, how can you change the class definition to support cases where you have MyClass<T, Alloc>, similar to how, say, STL vector provides
I\'m pulling my hair due to the following problem: I am following the example given in boost.interprocess documentation to instantiate a fixed-size ring buffer buffer class that I wrote in shared memo
I\'ve stared at the Boost.Interprocess documentation for hours but still haven\'t been able to figure this out. In the doc, they have an example of creating a vector in shared memory like so:
I would like to have a manager process sharing graphs via shared memory, read-only for other processes which will run various graph algorithms on these graphs. I would like to ask some questions emerg
I am being especially dense about this but it seems I\'m missing an important, basic point or something, since what I want to do should be common:
This is driving me wild with frustration. I am just trying to create a shared memory buffer class that uses in shared memory created through Boost.Interprocess where I can read/store data. I wrote the
I found this: Fast interprocess synchronization method I used to believe that a pthread mutex can only be shared between two threads in the same address space.
If I have the following psuedocode: sharedVariable = somevalue; CreateThread(threadWhichUsesSharedVariable);
I want to allocate and initialise a fairly large chunk of contiguous memory (~1GB), then mark it as read-only and fork multiple (say several dozen) child processes which will use it, without making th
So let\'s I have a struct that I want to read from user-level space that is defined in the kernel-space, but the user-level space has multiple processes.
加载中,请稍侯......