The C++0x draft has a notion of fences which seems very distinct from a CPU/chip level notion of fences, or say what the linux kernel guys expect of fences. The question is whether the draft really im
The C++1x standard has deprecated the old STL binder functions in favor of the more universal std::bind.However, it seems that std::not1 and std::not2 are not deprecated in favor of a universal std::n
#include <type_traits> template<class开发者_StackOverflow中文版 T> typename std::remove_reference<T>::type&& move(T&& v)
I can access member functions of a null shared_ptr object : #include <memory> #include <iostream>
I wish to create (std::getline()) and manipulate UTF-16 strings in the Android NDK, so that I can pass them (relatively) painlessly back to Java for display. Currently, I\'m using C++0x, using the LOC
Lets say I have something like the following: a.hpp: class B; class A { private: std::unique_ptr<B> b_;
I\'m working on an Event library and I\'m facing a problem with Variadic templates. All is working very nice except the fact that I can\'t pass references as parameters...
If I define a function which accepts an rvalue reference parameter: template <typename T> void fooT(T &&x) {}
Edited to remove the first warning The following code works as expected in g++ 4.4.0 under mingw32: #include <cstdio>
This question already has an answer here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: How does this “size of array” template function work?
加载中,请稍侯......