(Prompted by an answer.) Given N3290, §7.1.6.2p4, where the list items are unnumbered, but numbered here for our convenience:
I\'m trying to fill std::map with std::transform. Next code compiles without error: std::set<std::wstring> in; // \"in\" is filled with data
Somewhere in my code I have a local std::unique_ptr<T>. I need to do stuff with the object pointed at, and I use a function for that:
When trying to compile the following code #include <thread> #include <iostream> void foo() { std::cout << \"foo\\n\"; }
Sorry for the funny title. Prior to C++0x, there are restrictions in the use of function-local structs (“local types”) as template arguments. My question is essentially if similar restrictions appl
Is it possible to design and how should I make overloaded operator+ for my class C to have this possible:
I found some code using std::shared_ptr to perform arbitrary cleanup at shutdown. At first I thought this code could not possibly work, but then I tried the following:
Say I have a templated Action template <class ArgT> struct Action { Action(::boost::function< void(ArgT) > func)
I\'ve asked a few questions which have touched around this issue, but I\'ve been getting differing responses, so I thought best to ask it directly.
Consider the following code: #include <iostream> #include <type_traits> struct A { A() {} A(const A&) { std::cout << \"Copy\" << std::endl; }
加载中,请稍侯......