I was wondering if some form of type erasure exists for dealing with methods that have the sa开发者_JS百科me name and arguments but return different values like in my example below (begin and end).I\'
Is the following singleton implementation data-race free? static std::atomic<Tp *> m_instance; ...
Why has std::swap been moved to the <utility> header for C++11? N3290 C.2.7 says: 17.6.3.2 Effect on original feature: Function swap moved to a different header
I\'m working with a library that includes a set of preprocessor libraries.One of them is a FOR_EACH style macro which iterates over a __VA_ARGS__ and calls a user-provided macro for each argument.The
I want to determine if any variadic class template is the base of another class.Typically I\'d use std::is_base_of, but I don\'t think my use case fits, and I\'m not sure if there\'s already something
I\'m giving C++0x a try and I was wondering how to solve the following problem that came up. I\'ve got a variadic template class:
I have an almost working solution.However, it fails to compile some simple cases, and I can\'t decipher the error message.
There was an answer on stackoverflow (which I can\'t seem to find anymore) which demonstrated how a variadic template can be used in C++11 to create a static array at compile time:
Is there any way to do it nicely. When I try to use Boost\'s to_upper(), I get a std::bad_cast, so I ended with something like this:
Let\'s say that I\'m writing a function that returns some sort of proxy object, let\'s say for lazy evaluation or some other purpose. If I write code like
加载中,请稍侯......