Wouldn\'t it make sense if p->m was just syntactic sugar for (*p).m? Essentially, every operator-> that I have ever written could have been implemented as follows:
I am so frustrated right now after several hours trying to find where shared_ptr is located. None of the examples I see show complete code to include the headers for shared_ptr (and working). Simply s
I have a StartComObjects function called when the user presses the Login button and a StopComObjects function called when the user presses the Cancel button.The StartComObjects function uses CComPtr.C
boost::intrusive_ptr requires int开发者_JAVA百科rusive_ptr_add_ref and intrusive_ptr_release to be defined. Why isn\'t a base class provided which will do this? There is an example here: http://lists.
Is it possible to get a raw pointer from boost:开发者_如何学C:weak_ptr? Boost\'s shared_ptr has get() method and \"->\" operator. Is there some rationale behind weak_ptr not having the same functional
How should an error during resource deallocation be handled, when the object representing the resource is contained in a shared pointer?
To implement reference counting we use an IUnknown-like interface and a smart pointer template class. The interface has implementation for all the reference-count methods, including Release():
I\'m trying to use smart pointers such as auto_ptr, shared_ptr. However, I don\'t know how to use it in this situation.
I remember encountering this concept before, but can\'t find it in Google now. If I have an object of type A, which directly embeds an object of type B:
I\'m quite new to smart pointers and was trying to refactor some existing code to use auto_ptr. The question I have is about double pointers and their auto_ptr equivalent, if that makes sense.
加载中,请稍侯......