Free function allocate_shared can be used with any standard compliant allocator. But what about shared_ptr\'s constructor and reset method.
Let\'s say I have class that acts as a \"smart pointer\" and releases some kind of system resource when destroyed.
What is wrong with this program? #include <memory> #include <vector> int main() { std::vector<std::unique_ptr<int>> vec;
I am working in a very large legacy C++ code base which shall remain nameless.Being a legacy code base, it passes raw pointers around all over the place.But we are gradually trying to modernize it and
I can not get \'operator <\' to compile for a weak_ptr using VS10. Am I missing an #include or #using?
pl开发者_如何学Pythonease can anybody explain this code from C++ Reference site: #include <iostream>
I have a member variable declared as CComPtr&开发者_JS百科lt;IXMLDOMDocument2> m_spXMLDoc; XML document is created like this
In my new project I wish to (mostly for to see how it will work out) completely ban raw pointers from my code.
I have an object which has both a copy constructor and assignment operator defined.It is enclosed inside a sha开发者_高级运维red pointer.
I used to write code like this: class P {}; class Q: public P {}; class A { // takes ownership A(P* p): p_(p) {}
加载中,请稍侯......