Inspired by a recent question, I\'d like to know if any开发者_如何学Pythonone knows how to get gcc to generate the x86-64 bts instruction (bit test and set) on the Linux x86-64 platforms, without reso
I have a brand-new off-the-cd OSX 10.6 installation. I\'d now like to compile the following trivial C program as a 64bit binary:
Say I have the following: @interface MyClass : NSObject { NSString* _foobar; } @property (nonatomic, retain) NSString* foobar;
We just had our hosting provider build out a new RHEL 5 box for us to test some legacy stuff on: uname -a: Linux myserver.foo.com 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Dec 9 03:29:54 EST 2009 i686 i686 i386
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references,or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, a
I\'m interested in different aspects of portability (as you can see when browsing my other questions), so I read a lot about it. Quite often, I read/hear that Code should be written in a way that mak
Since distcc cannot keep states and just possible to send jobs and headers and let those servers to use only the data just sent and preprocess and compile, I think the lastest distcc has problem in sc
I\'d like to include some debug information 开发者_高级运维in an application, but hide certain symbols from appearing. Is there any way to do this with GCC 4.0 (or 4.2)? This is on OSX.Move all such c
I have a C++ executable and I\'m dynamically linking against several libraries (Boost, Xerces-c and c开发者_开发问答ustom libs).
Libraries don\'t always cont开发者_如何学Goain the _mcount symbol, but applications do (you can verify this with gobjdump or the nm utility). I\'ve read that _mcount is used to implement profiling, bu
加载中,请稍侯......