After reading about the problem of passing empty std::string objects between DLLs and EXEs, I am concerned about the configure options used to build my gcc / libstdc++. More specific I开发者_开发知识库
During a make, I\'m seeing an error along the lines of: cc1: warnings being treated as errors somefile开发者_如何学Python.c:200: error: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
I\'m trying to link the LizardTech GeoExpress DSDK into my own application.I use gcc so that we can compile on for platforms.On Linux and Mac this works easily: they provide a static library (libltids
Is it possible to bring GCC into an开发者_如何转开发 infinite loop by inputting strange source code? And if yes, how? Maybe one could do something with Template Metaprogramming?Yes.
symbol.h:179: note: expected ‘uintptr_t *’ but argument is of type ‘PRECEDENCE’ The corresponding code is :
While trying to compile my project, that uses some third party headers, with mingw 4.4, I encountered the following error:
I\'d like to get the C source lines inline with the assembly output to see what code is being generated.
I\'m building an executable using GCC 3.4.0 . The target is an embedded system. I\'ve been using a way of modularly defining \"console command handlers\" by defining a function pointer to a handler in
i have redhat with gcc 4.1.1 i have compile as \"gcc test.c\" and give the following error Error : expected \'=\' ,\',\' , \';\' , ásm\' or \'__ attribute__\' before \'<\' token
Does anyone know how I can for the g++ or gcc runtime to scramble the ram where an object was after delete?I have a theory that I\'m using an 开发者_StackOverflow社区object after it has been deleted b
加载中,请稍侯......