Let\'s define custom operators - let it be ++,equals :- op(900, yfx, equals). :- op(800, xfy, ++). And fact:
There is a lack of some predicates in one Prolog implementations, that are available in others. We can implement lacking predicates, let\'s call this \"Prolog Compatibility Layer\".
I\'d like to use predicates like: range(X,0,5) range(X,4,200) range(X,-1000000,1000000) dom_range(X,-1000000,1000000)
I\'m trying to keep my Prolog code modular, and I was wondering if anyone had any advice as to how to do this. The way I was doing this with simple consults, but that is getting cumbersome as the numb
I am newbie to prolog and I am trying to flatten a list which is like this: X = [[[0,0,1],[1,0,2]],[[0,1,3],[0,2,2]],[[0,3,5],[0,4,4]],[[0,5,4],[0,6,5]]]
I\'m reading \"Seven languages in seven weeks\" atm, and I\'m stumpe开发者_如何学JAVAd over some Prolog query that I don\'t understand the \'no\' response to.
How do I write all the so开发者_运维问答lutions obtained from a prolog program to a file?The short answer is to nest the call to your \"solutions\" predicate inside a repeat/fail loop, at the penultim
I am in the somewhat unfortunate position of interfacing C and Prolog code. We have some data collection code in C, and some analysis code in Gnu-Prolog. So what is the best method to interface C and
I\'ve bee开发者_开发知识库n using the gprolog thingy to do some things in prolog. But now when testing some more code I discovered that it does not support \"false\". Which is supported by swi? Use fa
I am attempting to compile QtScriptGenerator (gitorious) with Visual Studio 2010 (C++) and have run into a compile error.In searching for a solution, I have seen occasional references to compile break