I often get conflicts while pulling (merging) in git over differe开发者_开发技巧nces in newlines at the end of the file.
I h开发者_JAVA技巧ave two local branches master and dev. Both branches contained three folders: projectBeta
There are 3 of us working on a Django project using git. I have more experience than the other 2, so all the changes come by me before they get into \"master\".
When Git detects a conflict during merge, the default behaviour is to fill the file with <<< >>> === markers.
I am trying to use TortoiseSVN to merge a branch that has been out of the trunk for a very long time. It has been updated with the trunk, but I don\'t think subversion merge tracking has been working
Currently I am working in a feature branch that will soon be merged back into master. I recently tried just that and had some merge conflicts, which I had to fix manually.
could you please suggest me the way I could automatically resolve primary key conflicts during a merge between Publisher and Subscriber. It seems Sql Server doesn\'t do it out of the开发者_开发知识库
I am trying to do a git rebaseto migrate data to开发者_如何学Go a disconnected SVN clone branch.
Git开发者_如何学运维 is smart and will \"follow\" changes in history to make merging easier and auto merge more for me. Conflicts are delineated by the lines that have not changed around the change. W
I have some subversion source I have been working on. When I try to checkin I get the following error.