I\'d like to use ScalaTest\'s Checkers trait to use ScalaCheck from ScalaTest cases. A simple case I\'m playing with is:
I\'m trying to unit-tes开发者_StackOverflow社区t some Scala that is very collection-heavy. These collections are returned as Iterable[T], so I am interested in the contents of the collection, even if
The commented line below breaks my testing import org.scalatest.WordSpec class LSESuite extends WordSpec {
Is there something in Scalatest that will all开发者_开发技巧ow me to test the output to the standard out via a println statement?
The stacktraces are truncated - e.g. th开发者_如何学Goey end with [info]... Using last or changing traceLevel doesn\'t help - it simply prints the complete stacktrace of the sbt wrapper.
As per the title, I\'m wondering if it\'s possible to provide \"assumptions\" to Scalatest when defining a particular test case.Assumptions in this context would be preconditions for a test, such that
I\'am toying with Specs2 and ScalaTest for BDD in Scala. I\'ve written expectations in Specs2 when I am asserting that a given exception should not be thrown.
Can I have dependencies between scalaTest specs such that i开发者_StackOverflow社区f a test fails, all tests dependent on it are skipped?I didn\'t add that feature of TestNG because I didn\'t at the t
I\'ve been using ScalaTest\'s FeatureSpec for a couple of days now and I\'m trying to understand if it\'s possible to define the following spec using the built-in matchers (and if not, how I can write
does somebody know why @Test annotated methods which are inherited from a Scala trait are not found by the JUnit 4 test run开发者_JAVA百科ner? It gives me \"No JUnit tests found\".