This is my first question here so hope I provide enough detail. Feel free to ask for clarification. Taking the following into consideration, which works:
Given the following piece of code: final case class Attr[A](name: String)(implicit conv: String To A) {
In several different places in my application, I need to take a Seq[SalesRow] and return a Map[String,SalesRow], where the string is the name of a country.
Let there are classes Fruit, Orange, and Apple. abstract class Fruit class Orange extends Fruit class Apple extends Fruit
An implicit question to newcomers to Scala seems to be: where does the compiler look for implicits? I mean implicit because the question never seems to get fully formed, as if there weren\'t words for
The pimp-my-library pattern allows me to seemingly add a method to a class by making available an implicit conversion from that class t开发者_如何学Goo one that implements the method.
Assume I want to offer method foo on existing type A outside of my control. As far as I know, the canonical way to do this in Scala is implementing an implicit conversion from A to some type that impl
While trying to find a solution to another question ([1]) I came across a diverging implicit expansion error. I\'m looking for an explanation about what this means
In a simple way, what are context and view bounds and what is the difference between them? Some eas开发者_开发技巧y-to-follow examples would be great too!I thought this was asked already, but, if so
Scala implicits are very powerfull. I\'m curious if they are a new/unique feature of Scala, or the concept already existed in other programming languages.
加载中,请稍侯......