I\'m trying to create a class that inherits from multiple classes (as defined by a variadic template) and, for each class, passes the same parameter pack of args to the constructor of each class. Howe
I am training my template skills in C++ and want to implement a vector class. The class is defined by the vector dimension N and t开发者_如何学Gohe type T.
I\'m using Visual Studio 2008, and I want to implement string formatting function without Variable Argument List.
I am actually trying to see if I can get a minimal library that supports the very few operations I use from boost::fusion.
In an attempt to bypass GCC\'s unimplemented always-inlining variadic functions in libc++, I thought I could maybe wrap the variadic functions (like snprintf, more precisely, the *_l variant) in a var
I have the following code : template<size_t sz,typename T=float> class Vec{ T v[sz]; Vec(const T& val,const T&... nv){
I need reflections on my implementations of the C++11 variadic versions of std::min, std::max. Here are my two alternatives for std::min, where std::max is implemented analogously by just replacing st
The thinking is that since variadic templates are a compile time feature, there will be little ABI impact or runtime behaviour change.Is this possible?
I have this class template: template<class... T> class Test { std::vector<TestCase*> test_cases;
I am preparing myself for the defintion of user-defined literals with a Variadic Template template<...>
加载中,请稍侯......