开发者

const variable in c++

these are the some silly question ..i want to ask..please help me to comprehend it

const int i=100;   //1
///some code
long add=(long)&i;  //2

Doubt:for the above code..will compiler first go through the whole code

for deciding whether memory should be allocated or not..or first it ll store the

variable in read only memory place and then..allocate stroage as well at 2

doubt:why taking address of variable enforce compiler开发者_StackOverflow to store variable on memory..even

though rom or register too have address


In your code example, add contains the address, not the value, of i. I believe you may have thought that i was not stored in normal memory unless/until you take its address. This is not the case.

const does not mean the value is stored in ROM. It is stored in normal memory (often the stack) just like any other variable. const means the compiler will go to some lengths to prevent you from modifying the value.

const is not, and was never intended, to be some sort of security mechanism. If you obtain the address of the memory and want to modify it, you can do so. Of course this is almost always a bad idea, but if you really need to do it, it is possible.


I never wrote a compiler implementing this, but I think that it would be simple to just handle the variable as a normal variable but using the constant value where the variable value is used and using the address of the variable if the address is used.

If at the end of the scope of the variable no one took the address then I can just drop it instead of doing a real allocation because for all other uses the constant value has been used instead of compiling a variable loading operation.


constant values (not the only use for const, but the one used here) are not 'stored in normal memory' (nor in ROM, of course). the compiler simply uses the value (100 in this case) whenever the code uses the variable.

Of course, if the value isn't stored anywhere, there's no meaning of an address for the constant.

Other uses of const are stored in 'normal memory', and you can take their address, but the result is a 'pointer to const value', so it's (in principle) unusable for modification of the value. A hard cast would of course change that, so they trigger a nasty compiler warning.

also, remember that the C/C++ compiler operates totally at compile time (by definition!), it's nothing unusual that some use at a later part affects the code generation of an early part.

A very obvious example is the declaration of stack variables: the compiler has to take into account all the variables declared at any given level to be able to generate the stack allocation at the block entry.


I am a little confused about what you are asking but looking at your code:

i = 100 with a address of 0x?????????????

add = whatever the address is stored as a long int


There is no (dynamic) memory allocation in this code. The two local variables are created on stack. The address of i is taken and brutally cast into long, which is then assigned to the second variable.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜