开发者

Speed up Matplotlib?

I've read here that matplotlib is good at handling large 开发者_开发技巧data sets. I'm writing a data processing application and have embedded matplotlib plots into wx and have found matplotlib to be TERRIBLE at handling large amounts of data, both in terms of speed and in terms of memory. Does anyone know a way to speed up (reduce memory footprint of) matplotlib other than downsampling your inputs?

To illustrate how bad matplotlib is with memory consider this code:

import pylab
import numpy
a = numpy.arange(int(1e7)) # only 10,000,000 32-bit integers (~40 Mb in memory)
# watch your system memory now...
pylab.plot(a) # this uses over 230 ADDITIONAL Mb of memory


Downsampling is a good solution here -- plotting 10M points consumes a bunch of memory and time in matplotlib. If you know how much memory is acceptable, then you can downsample based on that amount. For example, let's say 1M points takes 23 additional MB of memory and you find it to be acceptable in terms of space and time, therefore you should downsample so that it's always below the 1M points:

if(len(a) > 1M):
   a = scipy.signal.decimate(a, int(len(a)/1M)+1)
pylab.plot(a)

Or something like the above snippet (the above may downsample too aggressively for your taste.)


I'm often interested in the extreme values too so, before plotting large chunks of data, I proceed in this way:

import numpy as np

s = np.random.normal(size=(1e7,))
decimation_factor = 10 
s = np.max(s.reshape(-1,decimation_factor),axis=1)

# To check the final size
s.shape

Of course np.max is just an example of extreme calculation function.

P.S. With numpy "strides tricks" it should be possible to avoid copying data around during reshape.


I was interested in preserving one side of a log sampled plot so I came up with this: (downsample being my first attempt)

def downsample(x, y, target_length=1000, preserve_ends=0):
    assert len(x.shape) == 1
    assert len(y.shape) == 1
    data = np.vstack((x, y))
    if preserve_ends > 0:
        l, data, r = np.split(data, (preserve_ends, -preserve_ends), axis=1)
    interval = int(data.shape[1] / target_length) + 1
    data = data[:, ::interval]
    if preserve_ends > 0:
        data = np.concatenate([l, data, r], axis=1)
    return data[0, :], data[1, :]

def geom_ind(stop, num=50):
    geo_num = num
    ind = np.geomspace(1, stop, dtype=int, num=geo_num)
    while len(set(ind)) < num - 1:
        geo_num += 1
        ind = np.geomspace(1, stop, dtype=int, num=geo_num)
    return np.sort(list(set(ind) | {0}))

def log_downsample(x, y, target_length=1000, flip=False):
    assert len(x.shape) == 1
    assert len(y.shape) == 1
    data = np.vstack((x, y))
    if flip:
        data = np.fliplr(data)
    data = data[:, geom_ind(data.shape[1], num=target_length)]
    if flip:
        data = np.fliplr(data)
    return data[0, :], data[1, :]

which allowed me to better preserve one side of plot:

newx, newy = downsample(x, y, target_length=1000, preserve_ends=50)
newlogx, newlogy = log_downsample(x, y, target_length=1000)
f = plt.figure()
plt.gca().set_yscale("log")
plt.step(x, y, label="original")
plt.step(newx, newy, label="downsample")
plt.step(newlogx, newlogy, label="log_downsample")
plt.legend()

Speed up Matplotlib?

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜