Database design for a survey [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.

---

Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.

Closed 4 years ago.

Improve this question

I need to create a survey where answers are stored in a database. I'm just wondering what would be the best way to implement this in the database, specifically the tables required. The survey contains different types of questions. For example: text fields for comments, multiple choice questions, and possibly questions that could contain more than one answer (i.e. check all that apply).

I've come up with two possible solutions:

1. Create a giant table which contains the answers for each survey submission. Each column would correspond to an answer from the survey. i.e. SurveyID, Answer1, Answer2, Answer3

   I don't think this开发者_StackOverflow中文版 is the best way since there are a lot of questions in this survey and doesn't seem very flexible if the survey is to change.

2. The other thing I thought of was creating a Question table and Answer table. The question table would contain all the questions for the survey. The answer table would contain individual answers from the survey, each row linked to a question.

   A simple example:

   tblSurvey: SurveyID

   tblQuestion: QuestionID, SurveyID, QuestionType, Question

   tblAnswer: AnswerID, UserID, QuestionID, Answer

   tblUser: UserID, UserName

   My problem with this is that there could be tons of answers which would make the Answer table pretty huge. I'm not sure that's so great when it comes to performance.

I'd appreciate any ideas and suggestions.

---

I think that your model #2 is fine, however you can take a look at the more complex model which stores questions and pre-made answers (offered answers) and allows them to be re-used in different surveys.

- One survey can have many questions; one question can be (re)used in many surveys.
- One (pre-made) answer can be offered for many questions. One question can have many answers offered. A question can have different answers offered in different surveys. An answer can be offered to different questions in different surveys. There is a default "Other" answer, if a person chooses other, her answer is recorded into Answer.OtherText.
- One person can participate in many surveys, one person can answer specific question in a survey only once.

---

My design is shown below.

The latest create script is at https://gist.github.com/durrantm/1e618164fd4acf91e372

The script and the mysql workbench.mwb file are also available at
https://github.com/durrantm/survey

---

Definitely option #2, also I think you might have an oversight in the current schema, you might want another table:

+-----------+
| tblSurvey |
|-----------|
| SurveyId  |
+-----------+

+--------------+
| tblQuestion  |
|--------------|
| QuestionID   |
| SurveyID     |
| QuestionType |
| Question     |
+--------------+

+--------------+
| tblAnswer    |
|--------------|
| AnswerID     |
| QuestionID   |
| Answer       |
+--------------+

+------------------+
| tblUsersAnswer   |
|------------------|
| UserAnswerID     |
| AnswerID         |
| UserID           |
| Response         |
+------------------+

+-----------+
| tblUser   |
|-----------|
| UserID    |
| UserName  |
+-----------+

Each question is going to probably have a set number of answers which the user can select from, then the actual responses are going to be tracked in another table.

Databases are designed to store a lot of data, and most scale very well. There is no real need to user a lesser normal form simply to save on space anymore.

---

As a general rule, modifying schema based on something that a user could change (such as adding a question to a survey) should be considered fairly smelly. There's cases where it can be appropriate, particularly when dealing with large amounts of data, but know what you're getting into before you dive in. Having just a "responses" table for each survey means that adding or removing questions is potentially very costly, and it's very difficult to do analytics in a question-agnostic way.

I think your second approach is best, but if you're certain you're going to have a lot of scale concerns, one thing that has worked for me in the past is a hybrid approach:

1. Create detailed response tables to store per-question responses as you've described in 2. This data would generally not be directly queried from your application, but would be used for generating summary data for reporting tables. You'd probably also want to implement some form of archiving or expunging for this data.
2. Also create the responses table from 1 if necessary. This can be used whenever users want to see a simple table for results.
3. For any analytics that need to be done for reporting purposes, schedule jobs to create additional summary data based on the data from 1.

This is absolutely a lot more work to implement, so I really wouldn't advise this unless you know for certain that this table is going to run into massive scale concerns.

---

The second approach is best.

If you want to normalize it further you could create a table for question types

The simple things to do are:

• Place the database and log on their own disk, not all on C as default
• Create the database as large as needed so you do not have pauses while the database grows

We have had log tables in SQL Server Table with 10's of millions rows.

---

No 2 looks fine.

For a table with only 4 columns it shouldn't be a problem, even with a good few million rows. Of course this can depend on what database you are using. If its something like SQL Server then it would be no problem.

You'd probably want to create an index on the QuestionID field, on the tblAnswer table.

Of course, you need to specify what Database you are using as well as estimated volumes.

---

You may choose to store the whole form as a JSON string.

Not sure about your requirement, but this approach would work in some circumstances.

---

Looks pretty complete for a smiple survey. Don't forget to add a table for 'open values', where a customer can provide his opinion via a textbox. Link that table with a foreign key to your answer and place indexes on all your relational columns for performance.

---

Number 2 is correct. Use the correct design until and unless you detect a performance problem. Most RDBMS will not have a problem with a narrow but very long table.

---

Having a large Answer table, in and of itself, is not a problem. As long as the indexes and constraints are well defined you should be fine. Your second schema looks good to me.

---

Given the proper index your second solution is normalized and good for a traditional relational database system.

I don't know how huge is huge but it should hold without problem a couple million answers.