Rails, using has_many through and fields_for
I have a little trouble getting this to work.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :events, :through => :event_users
has_many :event_users
accepts_nested_attributes_for :event_users, :allow_destroy => true, :reject_if => proc { |obj| obj.blank? }
end
class Event < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :event_users
has_many :users, :through => :event_users
accepts_nested_attributes_for :users, :reject_if => lambda { |a| a[:nick].blank? }, :allow_destroy => true
end
class EventUser < ActiveRecord::Base
set_table_name :events_users
belongs_to :event
belongs_to :user
end
Table-layout:
events_users
user_id
event_id
is_participating
events
id
name
users
id
name
This is the code for the form
<%= form_for @event do |f| %>
<%= f.fields_for :users, f.object.users do |builder| %>
<%= builder.text_field :name, "Name" %>
<%= f.fields_for :event_users do |builder2| %>
<%= builder2.hidden_field :is_participating, :valu开发者_运维技巧e => true %>
<% end %>
<% end %>
<% end %>
What I'm trying to accomplish is to set the field is_participating in the events_users table, but it doesn't work!
I had this same problem and essentially what I did was the following:
<%= form_for @event do |f| %>
<%= f.fields_for :event_users, @event_user do |builder| %>
<%= builder.hidden_field :is_participating, :value => true %>
<%= f.fields_for :users, f.object.user do |builder2| %>
<%= builder2.text_field :name, "Name" %>
<% end %>
<% end %>
<% end %>
i.e., I switched the order of the nested objects. This requires that you have a relationship through your join table declared (which you do). It saved all the attributes across the three tables for me.
If you want to keep your current model, however, I wonder if you shouldn't have the same set up for the 2nd level nested form as the first. Namely, your f.fields_for :event_users should be followed by a comma and an instance of that class.
Does your events_users table not have an 'id' field as a primary key? Might help if you posted the table layout for your events_users join table.
精彩评论