Textually diffing JSON

As part of my release processes, I have to compare some JSON configuration data used by my application. As a first attempt, I just pretty-printed the JSON and diff'ed them (using kdiff3 or just diff).

As that data has grown, however, kdiff3 confuses different parts in the output, making additions look like giant modifies, odd deletions, etc. It makes it really hard to figure out what is different. I've tried other diff tools, too (meld, kompare, diff, a few others), but they all have the same problem.

Despite my best efforts, I can't seem to format the JSON in a way that the diff tools can understand.

Example data:

[
  {
    "name": "date",
    "type": "date",
    "nullable": true,
    "state": "enabled"
  },
  {
    "name": "owner",
    "type": "string",
    "nullable": false,
    "state": "enabled",
  }
  ...lots more...
]

The above probably wouldn't cause the problem (the problem occurs when there begin to be hundreds of lines), but thats the gist of what is being compared.

Thats just a sample; the full objects are 4-5 attributes, and some attributes have 4-5 attributes in them. The attribu开发者_开发百科te names are pretty uniform, but their values pretty varied.

In general, it seems like all the diff tools confuse the closing "}" with the next objects closing "}". I can't seem to break them of this habit.

I've tried adding whitespace, changing indentation, and adding some "BEGIN" and "END" strings before and after the respective objects, but the tool still get confused.

If any of your tool has the option, Patience Diff could work a lot better for you. I'll try to find a tool with it (other tha Git and Bazaar) and report back.

Edit: It seems that the implementation in Bazaar is usable as a standalone tool with minimal changes.

Edit2: WTH, why not paste the source of the new cool diff script you made me hack? Here it is, no copyright claim on my side, it's just Bram/Canonical's code re-arranged.

#!/usr/bin/env python
# Copyright (C) 2005, 2006, 2007 Canonical Ltd
# Copyright (C) 2005 Bram Cohen, Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 Canonical Ltd
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA


import os
import sys
import time
import difflib
from bisect import bisect

__all__ = ['PatienceSequenceMatcher', 'unified_diff', 'unified_diff_files']

py3k = False
try:
    xrange
except NameError:
    py3k = True
    xrange = range

# This is a version of unified_diff which only adds a factory parameter
# so that you can override the default SequenceMatcher
# this has been submitted as a patch to python
def unified_diff(a, b, fromfile='', tofile='', fromfiledate='',
                 tofiledate='', n=3, lineterm='\n',
                 sequencematcher=None):
    r"""
    Compare two sequences of lines; generate the delta as a unified diff.

    Unified diffs are a compact way of showing line changes and a few
    lines of context.  The number of context lines is set by 'n' which
    defaults to three.

    By default, the diff control lines (those with ---, +++, or @@) are
    created with a trailing newline.  This is helpful so that inputs
    created from file.readlines() result in diffs that are suitable for
    file.writelines() since both the inputs and outputs have trailing
    newlines.

    For inputs that do not have trailing newlines, set the lineterm
    argument to "" so that the output will be uniformly newline free.

    The unidiff format normally has a header for filenames and modification
    times.  Any or all of these may be specified using strings for
    'fromfile', 'tofile', 'fromfiledate', and 'tofiledate'.  The modification
    times are normally expressed in the format returned by time.ctime().

    Example:

    >>> for line in unified_diff('one two three four'.split(),
    ...             'zero one tree four'.split(), 'Original', 'Current',
    ...             'Sat Jan 26 23:30:50 1991', 'Fri Jun 06 10:20:52 2003',
    ...             lineterm=''):
    ...     print line
    --- Original Sat Jan 26 23:30:50 1991
    +++ Current Fri Jun 06 10:20:52 2003
    @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
    +zero
     one
    -two
    -three
    +tree
     four
    """
    if sequencematcher is None:
        import difflib
        sequencematcher = difflib.SequenceMatcher

    if fromfiledate:
        fromfiledate = '\t' + str(fromfiledate)
    if tofiledate:
        tofiledate = '\t' + str(tofiledate)

    started = False
    for group in sequencematcher(None,a,b).get_grouped_opcodes(n):
        if not started:
            yield '--- %s%s%s' % (fromfile, fromfiledate, lineterm)
            yield '+++ %s%s%s' % (tofile, tofiledate, lineterm)
            started = True
        i1, i2, j1, j2 = group[0][3], group[-1][4], group[0][5], group[-1][6]
        yield "@@ -%d,%d +%d,%d @@%s" % (i1+1, i2-i1, j1+1, j2-j1, lineterm)
        for tag, i1, i2, j1, j2 in group:
            if tag == 'equal':
                for line in a[i1:i2]:
                    yield ' ' + line
                continue
            if tag == 'replace' or tag == 'delete':
                for line in a[i1:i2]:
                    yield '-' + line
            if tag == 'replace' or tag == 'insert':
                for line in b[j1:j2]:
                    yield '+' + line


def unified_diff_files(a, b, sequencematcher=None):
    """Generate the diff for two files.
    """
    mode = 'rb'
    if py3k: mode = 'r'
    # Should this actually be an error?
    if a == b:
        return []
    if a == '-':
        file_a = sys.stdin
        time_a = time.time()
    else:
        file_a = open(a, mode)
        time_a = os.stat(a).st_mtime

    if b == '-':
        file_b = sys.stdin
        time_b = time.time()
    else:
        file_b = open(b, mode)
        time_b = os.stat(b).st_mtime

    # TODO: Include fromfiledate and tofiledate
    return unified_diff(file_a.readlines(), file_b.readlines(),
                        fromfile=a, tofile=b,
                        sequencematcher=sequencematcher)


def unique_lcs_py(a, b):
    """Find the longest common subset for unique lines.

    :param a: An indexable object (such as string or list of strings)
    :param b: Another indexable object (such as string or list of strings)
    :return: A list of tuples, one for each line which is matched.
            [(line_in_a, line_in_b), ...]

    This only matches lines which are unique on both sides.
    This helps prevent common lines from over influencing match
    results.
    The longest common subset uses the Patience Sorting algorithm:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patience_sorting
    """
    # set index[line in a] = position of line in a unless
    # a is a duplicate, in which case it's set to None
    index = {}
    for i in xrange(len(a)):
        line = a[i]
        if line in index:
            index[line] = None
        else:
            index[line]= i
    # make btoa[i] = position of line i in a, unless
    # that line doesn't occur exactly once in both,
    # in which case it's set to None
    btoa = [None] * len(b)
    index2 = {}
    for pos, line in enumerate(b):
        next = index.get(line)
        if next is not None:
            if line in index2:
                # unset the previous mapping, which we now know to
                # be invalid because the line isn't unique
                btoa[index2[line]] = None
                del index[line]
            else:
                index2[line] = pos
                btoa[pos] = next
    # this is the Patience sorting algorithm
    # see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patience_sorting
    backpointers = [None] * len(b)
    stacks = []
    lasts = []
    k = 0
    for bpos, apos in enumerate(btoa):
        if apos is None:
            continue
        # as an optimization, check if the next line comes at the end,
        # because it usually does
        if stacks and stacks[-1] < apos:
            k = len(stacks)
        # as an optimization, check if the next line comes right after
        # the previous line, because usually it does
        elif stacks and stacks[k] < apos and (k == len(stacks) - 1 or
                                              stacks[k+1] > apos):
            k += 1
        else:
            k = bisect(stacks, apos)
        if k > 0:
            backpointers[bpos] = lasts[k-1]
        if k < len(stacks):
            stacks[k] = apos
            lasts[k] = bpos
        else:
            stacks.append(apos)
            lasts.append(bpos)
    if len(lasts) == 0:
        return []
    result = []
    k = lasts[-1]
    while k is not None:
        result.append((btoa[k], k))
        k = backpointers[k]
    result.reverse()
    return result


def recurse_matches_py(a, b, alo, blo, ahi, bhi, answer, maxrecursion):
    """Find all of the matching text in the lines of a and b.

    :param a: A sequence
    :param b: Another sequence
    :param alo: The start location of a to check, typically 0
    :param ahi: The start location of b to check, typically 0
    :param ahi: The maximum length of a to check, typically len(a)
    :param bhi: The maximum length of b to check, typically len(b)
    :param answer: The return array. Will be filled with tuples
                   indicating [(line_in_a, line_in_b)]
    :param maxrecursion: The maximum depth to recurse.
                         Must be a positive integer.
    :return: None, the return value is in the parameter answer, which
             should be a list

    """
    if maxrecursion < 0:
        print('max recursion depth reached')
        # this will never happen normally, this check is to prevent DOS attacks
        return
    oldlength = len(answer)
    if alo == ahi or blo == bhi:
        return
    last_a_pos = alo-1
    last_b_pos = blo-1
    for apos, bpos in unique_lcs_py(a[alo:ahi], b[blo:bhi]):
        # recurse between lines which are unique in each file and match
        apos += alo
        bpos += blo
        # Most of the time, you will have a sequence of similar entries
        if last_a_pos+1 != apos or last_b_pos+1 != bpos:
            recurse_matches_py(a, b, last_a_pos+1, last_b_pos+1,
                apos, bpos, answer, maxrecursion - 1)
        last_a_pos = apos
        last_b_pos = bpos
        answer.append((apos, bpos))
    if len(answer) > oldlength:
        # find matches between the last match and the end
        recurse_matches_py(a, b, last_a_pos+1, last_b_pos+1,
                           ahi, bhi, answer, maxrecursion - 1)
    elif a[alo] == b[blo]:
        # find matching lines at the very beginning
        while alo < ahi and blo < bhi and a[alo] == b[blo]:
            answer.append((alo, blo))
            alo += 1
            blo += 1
        recurse_matches_py(a, b, alo, blo,
                           ahi, bhi, answer, maxrecursion - 1)
    elif a[ahi - 1] == b[bhi - 1]:
        # find matching lines at the very end
        nahi = ahi - 1
        nbhi = bhi - 1
        while nahi > alo and nbhi > blo and a[nahi - 1] == b[nbhi - 1]:
            nahi -= 1
            nbhi -= 1
        recurse_matches_py(a, b, last_a_pos+1, last_b_pos+1,
                           nahi, nbhi, answer, maxrecursion - 1)
        for i in xrange(ahi - nahi):
            answer.append((nahi + i, nbhi + i))


def _collapse_sequences(matches):
    """Find sequences of lines.

    Given a sequence of [(line_in_a, line_in_b),]
    find regions where they both increment at the same time
    """
    answer = []
    start_a = start_b = None
    length = 0
    for i_a, i_b in matches:
        if (start_a is not None
            and (i_a == start_a + length)
            and (i_b == start_b + length)):
            length += 1
        else:
            if start_a is not None:
                answer.append((start_a, start_b, length))
            start_a = i_a
            start_b = i_b
            length = 1

    if length != 0:
        answer.append((start_a, start_b, length))

    return answer


def _check_consistency(answer):
    # For consistency sake, make sure all matches are only increasing
    next_a = -1
    next_b = -1
    for (a, b, match_len) in answer:
        if a < next_a:
            raise ValueError('Non increasing matches for a')
        if b < next_b:
            raise ValueError('Non increasing matches for b')
        next_a = a + match_len
        next_b = b + match_len


class PatienceSequenceMatcher_py(difflib.SequenceMatcher):
    """Compare a pair of sequences using longest common subset."""

    _do_check_consistency = True

    def __init__(self, isjunk=None, a='', b=''):
        if isjunk is not None:
            raise NotImplementedError('Currently we do not support'
                                      ' isjunk for sequence matching')
        difflib.SequenceMatcher.__init__(self, isjunk, a, b)

    def get_matching_blocks(self):
        """Return list of triples describing matching subsequences.

        Each triple is of the form (i, j, n), and means that
        a[i:i+n] == b[j:j+n].  The triples are monotonically increasing in
        i and in j.

        The last triple is a dummy, (len(a), len(b), 0), and is the only
        triple with n==0.

        >>> s = PatienceSequenceMatcher(None, "abxcd", "abcd")
        >>> s.get_matching_blocks()
        [(0, 0, 2), (3, 2, 2), (5, 4, 0)]
        """
        # jam 20060525 This is the python 2.4.1 difflib get_matching_blocks
        # implementation which uses __helper. 2.4.3 got rid of helper for
        # doing it inline with a queue.
        # We should consider doing the same for recurse_matches

        if self.matching_blocks is not None:
            return self.matching_blocks

        matches = []
        recurse_matches_py(self.a, self.b, 0, 0,
                           len(self.a), len(self.b), matches, 10)
        # Matches now has individual line pairs of
        # line A matches line B, at the given offsets
        self.matching_blocks = _collapse_sequences(matches)
        self.matching_blocks.append( (len(self.a), len(self.b), 0) )
        if PatienceSequenceMatcher_py._do_check_consistency:
            if __debug__:
                _check_consistency(self.matching_blocks)

        return self.matching_blocks


unique_lcs = unique_lcs_py
recurse_matches = recurse_matches_py
PatienceSequenceMatcher = PatienceSequenceMatcher_py


def main(args):
    import optparse
    p = optparse.OptionParser(usage='%prog [options] file_a file_b'
                                    '\nFiles can be "-" to read from stdin')
    p.add_option('--patience', dest='matcher', action='store_const', const='patience',
                 default='patience', help='Use the patience difference algorithm')
    p.add_option('--difflib', dest='matcher', action='store_const', const='difflib',
                 default='patience', help='Use python\'s difflib algorithm')

    algorithms = {'patience':PatienceSequenceMatcher, 'difflib':difflib.SequenceMatcher}

    (opts, args) = p.parse_args(args)
    matcher = algorithms[opts.matcher]

    if len(args) != 2:
        print('You must supply 2 filenames to diff')
        return -1

    for line in unified_diff_files(args[0], args[1], sequencematcher=matcher):
        sys.stdout.write(line)


if __name__ == '__main__':
    sys.exit(main(sys.argv[1:]))

Edit 3: I've also made a minimally standalone version of Neil Fraser's Diff Match and Patch, I'd be very interested in a comparison of results for your use case. Again, I claim no copyrights.

Edit 4: I just found DataDiff, which might be another tool to try.

DataDiff is a library to provide human-readable diffs of python data structures. It can handle sequence types (lists, tuples, etc), sets, and dictionaries.

Dictionaries and sequences will be diffed recursively, when applicable.

So, I wrote a tool to do unified diffs of JSON files a while ago that might be of some interest.

https://github.com/jclulow/jsondiff

Some examples of input and output for the tool appear on the github page.

You should checkout difflet from substack. It's both a node.js module and command-line utility that does exactly this:

https://github.com/substack/difflet

I know this is a pretty old question, but the python module "JSON Tools" provides another solution for diffing json files:

https://pypi.python.org/pypi/json_tools https://bitbucket.org/vadim_semenov/json_tools/src/75cc15381188c760badbd5b66aef9941a42c93fa?at=default

Eclipse might do better. Open the two files in an eclipse project, select them both, and right click --> compare --> with each other.

Beyond formatting changes, diffing tool should also order JSON object properties in a stable manner (alphabetically, for example), since the order of properties is semantically meaningless. That is, reordering of properties should not change the meaning of contents.

Other than this, parsing and pretty-printing in a way that puts at most one entry on a single line might allow use of textual diff. If not, any diff algorithm that works on trees (which is used for xml diffing) should work better.