python multidimensional list.. how to grab one dimension?

my question is, is I have a list like the following:

someList = [[0,1,2],[3,4,5],[6,7,8]]

how would I get the first entry of each sublist?

I know I could do this:

newList = []
for entry in someList:
    newList.append(entry[0])

where newList would be:

[0, 3, 6]

But is there a way to do something like:

newList = someList[:][0] 

?

EDIT:

Efficiency i开发者_运维百科s of great concern. I am actually going through a list that has over 300000 entries

EDIT: Here's some actual numbers! The izip, list comprehension, and numpy ways of doing this are all about the same speed.

# zip
>>> timeit.timeit( "newlist = zip(*someList)[0]", setup = "someList = [range(1000000), range(1000000), range(1000000)]", number = 10 )
1.4984046398561759

# izip
>>> timeit.timeit( "newlist = izip(*someList).next()", setup = "someList = range(1000000), range(1000000), range(1000000)]; from itertools import izip", number = 10 )
2.2186223645803693e-05

# list comprehension
>>> timeit.timeit( "newlist = [li[0] for li in someList]", setup = "someList = [range(1000000), range(1000000), range(1000000)]", number = 10 )
1.4677040212518477e-05

# numpy
>>> timeit.timeit( "newlist = someList[0,:]", setup = "import numpy as np; someList = np.array([range(1000000), range(1000000), range(1000000)])", number = 10 )
6.6217344397045963e-05
>>>

For large data structures like this you should use numpy, which implementes an array type in C and hence is significantly more efficient. It also provides all the matrix manipulation you will ever want.

>>> import numpy as np
>>> foo = np.array([[0,1,2],[3,4,5],[6,7,8]])
>>> foo[:,0]
array([0, 3, 6])

You can also transpose...

>>> foo.transpose()
array([[0, 3, 6],
       [1, 4, 7],
       [2, 5, 8]])

...work with n-dimensional arrays...

>>> foo = np.zeros((3,3,3))
>>> foo
array([[[ 0.,  0.,  0.],
        [ 0.,  0.,  0.],
        [ 0.,  0.,  0.]],

       [[ 0.,  0.,  0.],
        [ 0.,  0.,  0.],
        [ 0.,  0.,  0.]],

       [[ 0.,  0.,  0.],
        [ 0.,  0.,  0.],
        [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]])
>>> foo[0,...]
array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  0.,  0.],
       [ 0.,  0.,  0.]])

..do efficient linear algebra...

>>> foo = no.ones((3,3))
>>> np.linalg.qr(foo)
(array([[-0.57735027,  0.81649658,  0.        ],
       [-0.57735027, -0.40824829, -0.70710678],
       [-0.57735027, -0.40824829,  0.70710678]]), array([[ -1.73205081e+00,  -1.
73205081e+00,  -1.73205081e+00],
       [  0.00000000e+00,  -1.57009246e-16,  -1.57009246e-16],
       [  0.00000000e+00,   0.00000000e+00,   0.00000000e+00]]))

...and basically do anything that Matlab can.

Perfect case for a list comprehension:

[sublist[0] for sublist in someList]

Since efficiency is a major concern, this will be much faster than the zip approach. Depending what you're doing with the result, you may be able to get even more efficiency by using the generator expression approach:

(sublist[0] for sublist in someList)

Note that this returns a generator instead of a list though, so can't be indexed into.

zip(*someList)[0]

EDIT:

In response to recursive's comment: One might also use

from itertools import izip
izip(*someList).next()

for better performance.

Some timing analysis:

python -m timeit "someList = [range(1000000), range(1000000), range(1000000)]; newlist = zip(*someList)[0]"
10 loops, best of 3: 498 msec per loop
python -m timeit "someList = [range(1000000), range(1000000), range(1000000)]; from itertools import izip; newlist = izip(*someList).next()"
10 loops, best of 3: 111 msec per loop
python -m timeit "someList = [range(1000000), range(1000000), range(1000000)]; newlist = [li[0] for li in someList]"
10 loops, best of 3: 110 msec per loop

So izip and the list comprehension play in the same league.

Of course the list comprehension is more flexible when you need an index other than 0, and is more explicit.

EDIT2:

Even the numpy solution is not as fast (but I might have chosen a non-representative example):

python -m timeit "import numpy as np; someList = np.array([range(1000000), range(1000000), range(1000000)]); newList = someList[:,0]"
10 loops, best of 3: 551 msec per loop