Why isn't web2py more readily adopted? [closed]

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 12 years ago.

I have been playing with python and different web frameworks. I started with Django, but am not in so deep that I am entrenched. I really quite like python but have not found that "perfect" web solution.

My qualifications of perfect would be:

• simple to learn/code
• simple to host (my webhost, Site5, isn't exactly python-friendly)
• widely supported/used

Web2Py seems like it might fit. Their case against simplicity is solid and it seems pretty simple to fire up an webserver (though the quest for a python-friendly web host 开发者_StackOverflow社区continues). And Web2Py does not seem to be widely used. But why not?

Tangents:

Which framework do you use and why?

Who do you use for your python web hosting?

---

Django is more widely used, because Django is (already) more widely used.