Handling exceptions from Java ExecutorService tasks
I'm trying to use Java's ThreadPoolExecutor
class to run a large number of heavy weight tasks with a fixed number of threads. Each of the tasks has many places during which it may fail due to exceptions.
I've subclassed ThreadPoolExecutor
and I've overridden the afterExecute
method which is supposed to provide any uncaught exceptions encountered while running a task. However, I can't seem to make it work.
For example:
p开发者_运维问答ublic class ThreadPoolErrors extends ThreadPoolExecutor {
public ThreadPoolErrors() {
super( 1, // core threads
1, // max threads
1, // timeout
TimeUnit.MINUTES, // timeout units
new LinkedBlockingQueue<Runnable>() // work queue
);
}
protected void afterExecute(Runnable r, Throwable t) {
super.afterExecute(r, t);
if(t != null) {
System.out.println("Got an error: " + t);
} else {
System.out.println("Everything's fine--situation normal!");
}
}
public static void main( String [] args) {
ThreadPoolErrors threadPool = new ThreadPoolErrors();
threadPool.submit(
new Runnable() {
public void run() {
throw new RuntimeException("Ouch! Got an error.");
}
}
);
threadPool.shutdown();
}
}
The output from this program is "Everything's fine--situation normal!" even though the only Runnable submitted to the thread pool throws an exception. Any clue to what's going on here?
Thanks!
WARNING: It should be noted that this solution will block the calling thread in future.get()
.
If you want to process exceptions thrown by the task, then it is generally better to use Callable
rather than Runnable
.
Callable.call()
is permitted to throw checked exceptions, and these get propagated back to the calling thread:
Callable task = ...
Future future = executor.submit(task);
// do something else in the meantime, and then...
try {
future.get();
} catch (ExecutionException ex) {
ex.getCause().printStackTrace();
}
If Callable.call()
throws an exception, this will be wrapped in an ExecutionException
and thrown by Future.get()
.
This is likely to be much preferable to subclassing ThreadPoolExecutor
. It also gives you the opportunity to re-submit the task if the exception is a recoverable one.
From the docs:
Note: When actions are enclosed in tasks (such as FutureTask) either explicitly or via methods such as submit, these task objects catch and maintain computational exceptions, and so they do not cause abrupt termination, and the internal exceptions are not passed to this method.
When you submit a Runnable, it'll get wrapped in a Future.
Your afterExecute should be something like this:
public final class ExtendedExecutor extends ThreadPoolExecutor {
// ...
protected void afterExecute(Runnable r, Throwable t) {
super.afterExecute(r, t);
if (t == null && r instanceof Future<?>) {
try {
Future<?> future = (Future<?>) r;
if (future.isDone()) {
future.get();
}
} catch (CancellationException ce) {
t = ce;
} catch (ExecutionException ee) {
t = ee.getCause();
} catch (InterruptedException ie) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
}
if (t != null) {
System.out.println(t);
}
}
}
The explanation for this behavior is right in the javadoc for afterExecute:
Note: When actions are enclosed in tasks (such as FutureTask) either explicitly or via methods such as submit, these task objects catch and maintain computational exceptions, and so they do not cause abrupt termination, and the internal exceptions are not passed to this method.
I got around it by wrapping the supplied runnable submitted to the executor.
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> {
try {
runnable.run();
} catch (Throwable e) {
Log.info(Concurrency.class, "runAsync", e);
}
}, executorService);
I'm using VerboseRunnable
class from jcabi-log, which swallows all exceptions and logs them. Very convenient, for example:
import com.jcabi.log.VerboseRunnable;
scheduler.scheduleWithFixedDelay(
new VerboseRunnable(
Runnable() {
public void run() {
// the code, which may throw
}
},
true // it means that all exceptions will be swallowed and logged
),
1, 1, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS
);
Another solution would be to use the ManagedTask and ManagedTaskListener.
You need a Callable or Runnable which implements the interface ManagedTask.
The method getManagedTaskListener
returns the instance you want.
public ManagedTaskListener getManagedTaskListener() {
And you implement in ManagedTaskListener the taskDone
method:
@Override
public void taskDone(Future<?> future, ManagedExecutorService executor, Object task, Throwable exception) {
if (exception != null) {
LOGGER.log(Level.SEVERE, exception.getMessage());
}
}
More details about managed task lifecycle and listener.
This works
- It is derived from SingleThreadExecutor, but you can adapt it easily
- Java 8 lamdas code, but easy to fix
It will create a Executor with a single thread, that can get a lot of tasks; and will wait for the current one to end execution to begin with the next
In case of uncaugth error or exception the uncaughtExceptionHandler will catch it
public final class SingleThreadExecutorWithExceptions { public static ExecutorService newSingleThreadExecutorWithExceptions(final Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler uncaughtExceptionHandler) { ThreadFactory factory = (Runnable runnable) -> { final Thread newThread = new Thread(runnable, "SingleThreadExecutorWithExceptions"); newThread.setUncaughtExceptionHandler( (final Thread caugthThread,final Throwable throwable) -> { uncaughtExceptionHandler.uncaughtException(caugthThread, throwable); }); return newThread; }; return new FinalizableDelegatedExecutorService (new ThreadPoolExecutor(1, 1, 0L, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS, new LinkedBlockingQueue(), factory){ protected void afterExecute(Runnable runnable, Throwable throwable) { super.afterExecute(runnable, throwable); if (throwable == null && runnable instanceof Future) { try { Future future = (Future) runnable; if (future.isDone()) { future.get(); } } catch (CancellationException ce) { throwable = ce; } catch (ExecutionException ee) { throwable = ee.getCause(); } catch (InterruptedException ie) { Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); // ignore/reset } } if (throwable != null) { uncaughtExceptionHandler.uncaughtException(Thread.currentThread(),throwable); } } }); } private static class FinalizableDelegatedExecutorService extends DelegatedExecutorService { FinalizableDelegatedExecutorService(ExecutorService executor) { super(executor); } protected void finalize() { super.shutdown(); } } /** * A wrapper class that exposes only the ExecutorService methods * of an ExecutorService implementation. */ private static class DelegatedExecutorService extends AbstractExecutorService { private final ExecutorService e; DelegatedExecutorService(ExecutorService executor) { e = executor; } public void execute(Runnable command) { e.execute(command); } public void shutdown() { e.shutdown(); } public List shutdownNow() { return e.shutdownNow(); } public boolean isShutdown() { return e.isShutdown(); } public boolean isTerminated() { return e.isTerminated(); } public boolean awaitTermination(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException { return e.awaitTermination(timeout, unit); } public Future submit(Runnable task) { return e.submit(task); } public Future submit(Callable task) { return e.submit(task); } public Future submit(Runnable task, T result) { return e.submit(task, result); } public List> invokeAll(Collection> tasks) throws InterruptedException { return e.invokeAll(tasks); } public List> invokeAll(Collection> tasks, long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException { return e.invokeAll(tasks, timeout, unit); } public T invokeAny(Collection> tasks) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException { return e.invokeAny(tasks); } public T invokeAny(Collection> tasks, long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException, TimeoutException { return e.invokeAny(tasks, timeout, unit); } } private SingleThreadExecutorWithExceptions() {} }
This is because of AbstractExecutorService :: submit
is wrapping your runnable
into RunnableFuture
(nothing but FutureTask
) like below
AbstractExecutorService.java
public Future<?> submit(Runnable task) {
if (task == null) throw new NullPointerException();
RunnableFuture<Void> ftask = newTaskFor(task, null); /////////HERE////////
execute(ftask);
return ftask;
}
Then execute
will pass it to Worker
and Worker.run()
will call the below.
ThreadPoolExecutor.java
final void runWorker(Worker w) {
Thread wt = Thread.currentThread();
Runnable task = w.firstTask;
w.firstTask = null;
w.unlock(); // allow interrupts
boolean completedAbruptly = true;
try {
while (task != null || (task = getTask()) != null) {
w.lock();
// If pool is stopping, ensure thread is interrupted;
// if not, ensure thread is not interrupted. This
// requires a recheck in second case to deal with
// shutdownNow race while clearing interrupt
if ((runStateAtLeast(ctl.get(), STOP) ||
(Thread.interrupted() &&
runStateAtLeast(ctl.get(), STOP))) &&
!wt.isInterrupted())
wt.interrupt();
try {
beforeExecute(wt, task);
Throwable thrown = null;
try {
task.run(); /////////HERE////////
} catch (RuntimeException x) {
thrown = x; throw x;
} catch (Error x) {
thrown = x; throw x;
} catch (Throwable x) {
thrown = x; throw new Error(x);
} finally {
afterExecute(task, thrown);
}
} finally {
task = null;
w.completedTasks++;
w.unlock();
}
}
completedAbruptly = false;
} finally {
processWorkerExit(w, completedAbruptly);
}
}
Finally
task.run();
in the above code call will callFutureTask.run()
. Here is the exception handler code, because of this you are NOT getting the expected exception.
class FutureTask<V> implements RunnableFuture<V>
public void run() {
if (state != NEW ||
!UNSAFE.compareAndSwapObject(this, runnerOffset,
null, Thread.currentThread()))
return;
try {
Callable<V> c = callable;
if (c != null && state == NEW) {
V result;
boolean ran;
try {
result = c.call();
ran = true;
} catch (Throwable ex) { /////////HERE////////
result = null;
ran = false;
setException(ex);
}
if (ran)
set(result);
}
} finally {
// runner must be non-null until state is settled to
// prevent concurrent calls to run()
runner = null;
// state must be re-read after nulling runner to prevent
// leaked interrupts
int s = state;
if (s >= INTERRUPTING)
handlePossibleCancellationInterrupt(s);
}
}
If you want to monitor the execution of task, you could spin 1 or 2 threads (maybe more depending on the load) and use them to take tasks from an ExecutionCompletionService wrapper.
The doc's example wasn't giving me the results I wanted.
When a Thread process was abandoned (with explicit interput();
s) Exceptions were appearing.
Also I wanted to keep the "System.exit" functionality that a normal main thread has with a typical throw
, I wanted this so that the programmer was not forced to work on the code having to worry on it's context (... a thread), If any error appears, it must either be a programming error, or the case must be solved in place with a manual catch... no need for overcomplexities really.
So I changed the code to match my needs.
@Override
protected void afterExecute(Runnable r, Throwable t) {
super.afterExecute(r, t);
if (t == null && r instanceof Future<?>) {
Future<?> future = (Future<?>) r;
boolean terminate = false;
try {
future.get();
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
terminate = true;
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (InterruptedException | CancellationException ie) {// ignore/reset
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
} finally {
if (terminate) System.exit(0);
}
}
}
Be cautious though, this code basically transforms your threads into a main thread Exception-wise, while keeping all it's parallel properties... But let's be real, designing architectures in function of the system's parallel mechanism (extends Thread
) is the wrong approach IMHO... unless an event driven design is strictly required....but then... if that is the requirement the question is: Is the ExecutorService even needed in this case?... maybe not.
If your ExecutorService
comes from an external source (i. e. it's not possible to subclass ThreadPoolExecutor
and override afterExecute()
), you can use a dynamic proxy to achieve the desired behavior:
public static ExecutorService errorAware(final ExecutorService executor) {
return (ExecutorService) Proxy.newProxyInstance(Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader(),
new Class[] {ExecutorService.class},
(proxy, method, args) -> {
if (method.getName().equals("submit")) {
final Object arg0 = args[0];
if (arg0 instanceof Runnable) {
args[0] = new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
final Runnable task = (Runnable) arg0;
try {
task.run();
if (task instanceof Future<?>) {
final Future<?> future = (Future<?>) task;
if (future.isDone()) {
try {
future.get();
} catch (final CancellationException ce) {
// Your error-handling code here
ce.printStackTrace();
} catch (final ExecutionException ee) {
// Your error-handling code here
ee.getCause().printStackTrace();
} catch (final InterruptedException ie) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
}
}
} catch (final RuntimeException re) {
// Your error-handling code here
re.printStackTrace();
throw re;
} catch (final Error e) {
// Your error-handling code here
e.printStackTrace();
throw e;
}
}
};
} else if (arg0 instanceof Callable<?>) {
args[0] = new Callable<Object>() {
@Override
public Object call() throws Exception {
final Callable<?> task = (Callable<?>) arg0;
try {
return task.call();
} catch (final Exception e) {
// Your error-handling code here
e.printStackTrace();
throw e;
} catch (final Error e) {
// Your error-handling code here
e.printStackTrace();
throw e;
}
}
};
}
}
return method.invoke(executor, args);
});
}
This is similar to mmm's solution, but a bit more understandable. Have your tasks extend an abstract class that wraps the run() method.
public abstract Task implements Runnable {
public abstract void execute();
public void run() {
try {
execute();
} catch (Throwable t) {
// handle it
}
}
}
public MySampleTask extends Task {
public void execute() {
// heavy, error-prone code here
}
}
Instead of subclassing ThreadPoolExecutor, I would provide it with a ThreadFactory instance that creates new Threads and provides them with an UncaughtExceptionHandler
精彩评论