What do people think of the new HTML5Boilerplate with the Normalizer.css [closed]

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 11 years ago.

Hello fellow designer/developers!

So I have just been updating my HTML5 template a开发者_JAVA技巧nd I have been trying to incorporate all the latest tips and tricks but in the end settled on combining HTML5Boilerplate with Grid960.

One big change to the HTML5Boilerplate is the use of Normalizer.css - This is a little weird for me because I am used to seeing the classic resets floating around the net.

Has anyone used the new Boilerplate?

What do you think of it?

What do you think of Normalizer.css!?

I kind of like its simplicity and so far I have not had any issues with using it. My basic mockup seems to work fine in all browsers I have loaded on my laptop.

Anyway I would really like to get some feedback on this just to get a glimpse of what others are doing with it and whether they like it or not.

I guess considering HTML5Boilerplate is so popular Normalizer.css will become the next "classic HTML5 reset" for most of us.

Looking forward to some replies!

Richard

---

I have tried 2.0 out on a few sites and quite frankly, I never even thought about it. I think that might be the goal - a sensible accross-the-board starting point from which you build your design. For me, the big plus with the HTML5boilerplate is the aggregation of best practices. Depending on client sensitivity, the window opening to download chrome frame for IE6 users might be a little heavy, but I certainly understand and applaud that worthy goal (and I hope the same applies to IE 7 & 8 - see Paul Irish's recent post on our Future IE Hell to Come)