Orchard: Full Source or Not?

We're going to be using Orchard as a base for a particular client. We're a C# shop running VS2K10. We'll throw it in our version control system as per the norm for our projects.

That said, we'll be creating custom modules based on the needs of 开发者_高级运维our clients. What approach does everyone here recommend?

1. Get full source from CodePlex and check that in
2. Download just the Orchard web code (similar to Web Platform Installer)

Problem with #1 is that the code base is rather large, but it will allow us to debug the site locally when developing.

What are the caveats with #2? Lack of debugging?

I'm curious what everyone's approach would be for this. I'm inclined to go with #1, get the full source, throw it in SVN, and build off of that.

Thoughts?

If you are going to develop modules using Visual Studio, just use the full source code. Disk space is cheap. Caveats with #2 are that it's immensely less comfortable. Why bother?

I use the full source version, but I only check the modules and themes that I'm working on into source control.

I did originally use just the web code, but found myself running into lots of little problems that were much easier to track down when using the full source.

I found that only source controlling the stuff I was working on made updating to later versions of Orchard much easier.

I'm no software engineer, but here is what I would do :

• Get the source code.
• Add it in your VS solution and source control.
• Do NOT reference the project(s).
• Add a post-build event on that project to copy the dll and the symbols (for debug) in the folders of the project that would otherwise refer this one.

If it crashed in a class from that project's assembly, you'll be able to specify the source code files since you got the symbols, and since you won't be modifying that project on a regular basis, your VS won't rebuild it every time. You could even unload the project if you want to save some memory, however trivial it might be.