Why can't Java convert an ArrayList<TreeSet<Integer>> into a List<Set<Object>>?
I'm attempting to do something that seems rather simple: sum the sizes of a list of sets. Netbeans gives the following warning/error:
actual argument java.util.ArrayList<java.util.TreeSet<java.lang.Integer>> cannot be converted to java.util.List<java.util.Set<java.lang.Object>> by method invocation conversion
for the following two pieces of code:
/**
* Sums the sizes of all sets in a list. Note that while there will be
* no duplicate elements in a single set, "sister" sets may contain
* elements, so the value returned is **not** equal to the number of unique
* elements in all sets.
* @param list, a List of Sets
* @return the number of elements contained in all sets
*/
public static int sizeOfListOfSets(List<Set<Object>> list) {
int size = 0;
for (Set<Object> set : list) {
size += set.size();
}
return size;
}
and then calling it with the following:
ArrayList<TreeSet<Integer>> testList = new ArrayList<TreeSet<Integer>>();
TreeSet<Integer> testSet;
int size = 0;
testSet = new TreeSet<Integer>();
testSet.add(new Integer(++size));
testSet.add(new Integer(++size));
testList.add(testSet);
testSet = new TreeSet<In开发者_如何学Goteger>();
testSet.add(new Integer(++size));
testList.add(testSet);
int expResult = size;
int result = Helpers.sizeOfListOfSets(testList);
the last line gives the compilation error:
error: method sizeOfListOfSets in class Helpers cannot be applied to given types;
1 error
So, why can't java.lang.Integer be converted to java.lang.Object?
A List<Integer>
is not a List<Object>
. If Java
allowed that, then you could call the method with List<String>
and you will be broken. As Jeremy Heiler
pointed out you can use List<? extends Object>
and you will be fine. This means every type which extends Object
is allowed. ?
is called a wildcard
in generic jargon.
Anything you declare as a generic type must be the exact same generic type always. The only think that can vary is the base type i.e.:
List<MyObject> myList = new ArrayList<MyObject>;
This is because for example if you had a parameter declared as List<Object>
, and you could pass it a List<Integer>
, then you would be able to add ANY kind of object to that list, which would break the type safety.
Although there is a workaround using the wildcard ?
, you still will NOT be able to add elements unless you do it like this <? super MyObject>
, because anything higher on the inheritance tree would be ok to add to the list.
The issue is not converting from an Integer to an Object, but from a list of Integer to a list of Object which fails because List<Integer>
is not a List<Object>
. Java compiler does not try to automatically cast generic types.
You might change your method declaration to something like this to get away with the error:
public static int sizeOfListOfSets(List<Set<? extends Object>> list)
Because that would enable you to put any object in that list. When you access elements later from your original list reference, it will contain non-Integer objects, although the list is still declared as a List<Integer>
- which means that you can't rely on what the type says anymore. Example:
List<Integer> intList = new ArrayList<Integer>();
doSomething(intList);
for (Integer i : intList) {
// i must be an Integer, so doSomething must not
// be able to put non-Integers into that list.
}
精彩评论