Operator[][] overload

Is it possible to overload [] operator twice? To allow, something like this: funct开发者_如何学Cion[3][3](like in a two dimensional array).

If it is possible, I would like to see some example code.

You can overload operator[] to return an object on which you can use operator[] again to get a result.

class ArrayOfArrays {
public:
    ArrayOfArrays() {
        _arrayofarrays = new int*[10];
        for(int i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
            _arrayofarrays[i] = new int[10];
    }

    class Proxy {
    public:
        Proxy(int* _array) : _array(_array) { }

        int operator[](int index) {
            return _array[index];
        }
    private:
        int* _array;
    };

    Proxy operator[](int index) {
        return Proxy(_arrayofarrays[index]);
    }

private:
    int** _arrayofarrays;
};

Then you can use it like:

ArrayOfArrays aoa;
aoa[3][5];

This is just a simple example, you'd want to add a bunch of bounds checking and stuff, but you get the idea.

For a two dimensional array, specifically, you might get away with a single operator[] overload that returns a pointer to the first element of each row.

Then you can use the built-in indexing operator to access each element within the row.

An expression x[y][z] requires that x[y] evaluates to an object d that supports d[z].

This means that x[y] should be an object with an operator[] that evaluates to a "proxy object" that also supports an operator[].

This is the only way to chain them.

Alternatively, overload operator() to take multiple arguments, such that you might invoke myObject(x,y).

It is possible if you return some kind of proxy class in first [] call. However, there is other option: you can overload operator() that can accept any number of arguments (function(3,3)).

One approach is using std::pair<int,int>:

class Array2D
{
    int** m_p2dArray;
public:
    int operator[](const std::pair<int,int>& Index)
    {
       return m_p2dArray[Index.first][Index.second];
    }
};

int main()
{
    Array2D theArray;
    pair<int, int> theIndex(2,3);
    int nValue;
    nValue = theArray[theIndex];
}

Of course, you may typedef the pair<int,int>

You can use a proxy object, something like this:

#include <iostream>

struct Object
{
    struct Proxy
    {
        Object *mObj;
        int mI;

        Proxy(Object *obj, int i)
        : mObj(obj), mI(i)
        {
        }

        int operator[](int j)
        {
            return mI * j;
        }
    };

    Proxy operator[](int i)
    {
        return Proxy(this, i);
    }
};

int main()
{
    Object o;
    std::cout << o[2][3] << std::endl;
}

If, instead of saying a[x][y], you would like to say a[{x,y}], you can do like this:

struct Coordinate {  int x, y; }

class Matrix {
    int** data;
    operator[](Coordinate c) {
        return data[c.y][c.x];
    }
}

It 'll be great if you can let me know what function, function[x] and function[x][y] are. But anyway let me consider it as an object declared somewhere like

SomeClass function;

(Because you said that it's operator overload, I think you won't be interested at array like SomeClass function[16][32];)

So function is an instance of type SomeClass. Then look up declaration of SomeClass for the return type of operator[] overload, just like

ReturnType operator[](ParamType);

Then function[x] will have the type ReturnType. Again look up ReturnType for the operator[] overload. If there is such a method, you could then use the expression function[x][y].

Note, unlike function(x, y), function[x][y] are 2 separate calls. So it's hard for compiler or runtime garantees the atomicity unless you use a lock in the context. A similar example is, libc says printf is atomic while successively calls to the overloaded operator<< in output stream are not. A statement like

std::cout << "hello" << std::endl;

might have problem in multi-thread application, but something like

printf("%s%s", "hello", "\n");

is fine.

template<class F>
struct indexer_t{
  F f;
  template<class I>
  std::result_of_t<F const&(I)> operator[](I&&i)const{
    return f(std::forward<I>(i))1;
  }
};
template<class F>
indexer_t<std::decay_t<F>> as_indexer(F&& f){return {std::forward<F>(f)};}

This lets you take a lambda, and produce an indexer (with [] support).

Suppose you have an operator() that supports passing both coordinates at onxe as two arguments. Now writing [][] support is just:

auto operator[](size_t i){
  return as_indexer(
    [i,this](size_t j)->decltype(auto)
    {return (*this)(i,j);}
  );
}

auto operator[](size_t i)const{
  return as_indexer(
    [i,this](size_t j)->decltype(auto)
    {return (*this)(i,j);}
  );
}

And done. No custom class required.

#include<iostream>

using namespace std;

class Array 
{
     private: int *p;
     public:
          int length;
          Array(int size = 0): length(size)
          {
                p=new int(length);
          }
          int& operator [](const int k)
          {
               return p[k];
          }
};
class Matrix
{
      private: Array *p;
      public: 
            int r,c;
            Matrix(int i=0, int j=0):r(i), c(j)
            {
                 p= new Array[r];
            }
            Array& operator [](const int& i)
            {
                 return p[i];
            }
};

/*Driver program*/
int main()
{
    Matrix M1(3,3); /*for checking purpose*/
    M1[2][2]=5;
}

struct test
{
    using array_reference = int(&)[32][32];

    array_reference operator [] (std::size_t index)
    {
        return m_data[index];
    }

private:

    int m_data[32][32][32];
};

Found my own simple solution to this.

vector< vector< T > > or T** is required only when you have rows of variable length and way too inefficient in terms of memory usage/allocations if you require rectangular array consider doing some math instead! see at() method:

template<typename T > class array2d {

protected:
    std::vector< T > _dataStore;
    size_t _sx;

public:
    array2d(size_t sx, size_t sy = 1): _sx(sx), _dataStore(sx*sy) {}
    T& at( size_t x, size_t y ) { return _dataStore[ x+y*sx]; }
    const T& at( size_t x, size_t y ) const { return _dataStore[ x+y*sx]; }
    const T& get( size_t x, size_t y ) const { return at(x,y); }
    void set( size_t x, size_t y, const T& newValue ) { at(x,y) = newValue; }
};

The shortest and easiest solution:

class Matrix
{
public:
  float m_matrix[4][4];

// for statements like matrix[0][0] = 1;
  float* operator [] (int index) 
  {
    return m_matrix[index];
  }

// for statements like matrix[0][0] = otherMatrix[0][0];
  const float* operator [] (int index) const 
  {
    return m_matrix[index];
  }

};

It is possible to overload multiple [] using a specialized template handler. Just to show how it works :

#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <numeric>
#include <tuple>
#include <array>

using namespace std;

// the number '3' is the number of [] to overload (fixed at compile time)
struct TestClass : public SubscriptHandler<TestClass,int,int,3> {

    // the arguments will be packed in reverse order into a std::array of size 3
    // and the last [] will forward them to callSubscript()
    int callSubscript(array<int,3>& v) {
        return accumulate(v.begin(),v.end(),0);
    }

};

int main() {


    TestClass a;
    cout<<a[3][2][9];  // prints 14 (3+2+9)

    return 0;
}

And now the definition of SubscriptHandler<ClassType,ArgType,RetType,N> to make the previous code work. It only shows how it can be done. This solution is optimal nor bug-free (not threadsafe for instance).

#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <numeric>
#include <tuple>
#include <array>

using namespace std;

template <typename ClassType,typename ArgType,typename RetType, int N> class SubscriptHandler;

template<typename ClassType,typename ArgType,typename RetType, int N,int Recursion> class SubscriptHandler_ {

    ClassType*obj;
    array<ArgType,N+1> *arr;

    typedef SubscriptHandler_<ClassType,ArgType,RetType,N,Recursion-1> Subtype;

    friend class SubscriptHandler_<ClassType,ArgType,RetType,N,Recursion+1>;
    friend class SubscriptHandler<ClassType,ArgType,RetType,N+1>;

public:

    Subtype operator[](const ArgType& arg){
        Subtype s;
        s.obj = obj;
        s.arr = arr;
        arr->at(Recursion)=arg;
        return s;
    }
};

template<typename ClassType,typename ArgType,typename RetType,int N> class SubscriptHandler_<ClassType,ArgType,RetType,N,0> {

    ClassType*obj;
    array<ArgType,N+1> *arr;

    friend class SubscriptHandler_<ClassType,ArgType,RetType,N,1>;
    friend class SubscriptHandler<ClassType,ArgType,RetType,N+1>;

public:

    RetType operator[](const ArgType& arg){
        arr->at(0) = arg;
        return obj->callSubscript(*arr);
    }

};


template<typename ClassType,typename ArgType,typename RetType, int N> class SubscriptHandler{

    array<ArgType,N> arr;
    ClassType*ptr;
    typedef SubscriptHandler_<ClassType,ArgType,RetType,N-1,N-2> Subtype;

protected:

    SubscriptHandler() {
        ptr=(ClassType*)this;
    }

public:

    Subtype operator[](const ArgType& arg){
        Subtype s;
        s.arr=&arr;
        s.obj=ptr;
        s.arr->at(N-1)=arg;
        return s;
    }
};

template<typename ClassType,typename ArgType,typename RetType> struct SubscriptHandler<ClassType,ArgType,RetType,1>{
    RetType operator[](const ArgType&arg) {
        array<ArgType,1> arr;
        arr.at(0)=arg;
        return ((ClassType*)this)->callSubscript(arr);
    }
};

With a std::vector<std::vector<type*>>, you can build the inside vector using custom input operator that iterate over your data and return a pointer to each data.

For example:

size_t w, h;
int* myData = retrieveData(&w, &h);

std::vector<std::vector<int*> > data;
data.reserve(w);

template<typename T>
struct myIterator : public std::iterator<std::input_iterator_tag, T*>
{
    myIterator(T* data) :
      _data(data)
    {}
    T* _data;

    bool operator==(const myIterator& rhs){return rhs.data == data;}
    bool operator!=(const myIterator& rhs){return rhs.data != data;}
    T* operator*(){return data;}
    T* operator->(){return data;}

    myIterator& operator++(){data = &data[1]; return *this; }
};

for (size_t i = 0; i < w; ++i)
{
    data.push_back(std::vector<int*>(myIterator<int>(&myData[i * h]),
        myIterator<int>(&myData[(i + 1) * h])));
}

Live example

This solution has the advantage of providing you with a real STL container, so you can use special for loops, STL algorithms, and so on.

for (size_t i = 0; i < w; ++i)
  for (size_t j = 0; j < h; ++j)
    std::cout << *data[i][j] << std::endl;

However, it does create vectors of pointers, so if you're using small datastructures such as this one you can directly copy the content inside the array.

Sample code:

template<class T>
class Array2D
{
public:
    Array2D(int a, int b)  
    {
        num1 = (T**)new int [a*sizeof(int*)];
        for(int i = 0; i < a; i++)
            num1[i] = new int [b*sizeof(int)];

        for (int i = 0; i < a; i++) {
            for (int j = 0; j < b; j++) {
                num1[i][j] = i*j;
            }
        }
    }
    class Array1D
    {
    public:
        Array1D(int* a):temp(a) {}
        T& operator[](int a)
        {
            return temp[a];
        }
        T* temp;
    };

    T** num1;
    Array1D operator[] (int a)
    {
        return Array1D(num1[a]);
    }
};


int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
    Array2D<int> arr(20, 30);

    std::cout << arr[2][3];
    getchar();
    return 0;
}

Using C++11 and the Standard Library you can make a very nice two-dimensional array in a single line of code:

std::array<std::array<int, columnCount>, rowCount> myMatrix {0};

std::array<std::array<std::string, columnCount>, rowCount> myStringMatrix;

std::array<std::array<Widget, columnCount>, rowCount> myWidgetMatrix;

By deciding the inner matrix represents rows, you access the matrix with an myMatrix[y][x] syntax:

myMatrix[0][0] = 1;
myMatrix[0][3] = 2;
myMatrix[3][4] = 3;

std::cout << myMatrix[3][4]; // outputs 3

myStringMatrix[2][4] = "foo";
myWidgetMatrix[1][5].doTheStuff();

And you can use ranged-for for output:

for (const auto &row : myMatrix) {
  for (const auto &elem : row) {
    std::cout << elem << " ";
  }
  std::cout << std::endl;
}

(Deciding the inner array represents columns would allow for an foo[x][y] syntax but you'd need to use clumsier for(;;) loops to display output.)