Are C++ recursive type definitions possible, in particular can I put a vector<T> within the definition of T?
For one of my projects, what I really wanted to do was this (simplifying it to the bare minimum);
struct Move
{
int开发者_Python百科 src;
int dst;
};
struct MoveTree
{
Move move;
std::vector<MoveTree> variation;
};
I must admit that I assumed that it wouldn't be possible to do this directly, I thought a vector of MoveTree s within a MoveTree would be verboten. But I tried it anyway, and it works beautifully. I am using Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 Express.
Is this portable ? Is it good practise ? Do I have anything to worry about ?
Edit: I've asked a second question hoping to find a good way of doing this.
The C++ Standard (2003) clearly says that instantiating a standard container with an incomplete type invokes undefined-behavior.
The spec says in §17.4.3.6/2,
In particular, the effects are undefined in the following cases:
__ [..]
— if an incomplete type (3.9) is used as a template argument when instantiating a template component.
__ [..]
Things have changed with the C++17 standard, which explicitely allows this types of recursion for std::list
, std::vector
and std::forward_list
. For reference, see http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4510.html and this answer: How can I declare a member vector of the same class?
MoveTree
is an incomplete type inside its definition. The standard does not guarantee instantiation of STL templates with incomplete types.
Use a pointer to the type in the Vector, this will be portable.
struct Move
{
int src;
int dst;
};
struct MoveTree;
struct MoveTree
{
Move move;
std::vector<MoveTree*> variation;
};
The MoveTree
elements in std::vector
are in an allocated (as in new []
) array. Only the control information (the pointer to the array, the size, etc) are stored within the std::vector
within MoveTree
.
No, it's not portable. codepad.org does not compile it.
t.cpp:14: instantiated from here
Line 215: error: '__gnu_cxx::_SGIAssignableConcept<_Tp>::__a' has incomplete type
compilation terminated due to -Wfatal-errors.
You should define copy constructors and assignment operators for both Move
and MoveTree
when using vector, otherwise it will use the compiler generated ones, which may cause problems.
精彩评论