first memcpy into buffer faster than direct access to pixels of CVPixelBufferGetBaseAddress
I noticed that accessing the pixels returned by CVPixelBufferGetBaseAddress
directly (I'm u开发者_JAVA百科sing two nested for-loops) is about 100 times slower than first allocating a buffer with malloc, memcpy the pixels into that buffer and then accessing the pixels in that buffer. Why is that?
精彩评论