The general guideline when writing classes (using the copy-and-swap idiom) is to provide a non throwing swap member function. (Effective C++, 3rd edition, Item 25 and other resources)
Let\'s say you have a piece of code like: resource = allocateResource(); try { /* dangerous code here*/ }
I\'m just a fledgling programmer that at least tries to program more than the best-case scenario. I\'ve been reading Herb Sutter\'s \"Exceptional C++\" and went through the exception-safety chapters t
EDIT: I should\'ve mentioned, I was looking at the documentation for Boost\'s ptr_sequence_adapter and it claims that their adapter for template< class U > void push_back( ::std::auto_ptr<U&g
In an answer to a question about std::stack::pop() I claimed that the reason pop does not return the value is for exception safety reason (what happens if the copy constructor throws).
自勉时步步生光 (Live) 陈粒/ 杨众国 专辑：这！就是原创 第八期 语种：国语 发行时间：2019-04-27
加载中,请稍侯......