Here is very simplified version of code that i have: class PrintJob : IEntity { public string UserName { get; set; }
I\'m developing an MVC3 application with EntityFramework v4.1. According to most common MVC best practices, i should separate my data access layer objects from my view-model objects. I should not use
We\'re running into a small problem deploying a web application to another environment. We created the application\'s db using Entity Framework Code First approach (db automatic created from Model).
Answers to similar questions are not working for me. Consider this string concat query: .Where(c => (
Is it possible to define a many-to-many relationship in Entity Framework 4.1 (Code First approach) using Data Annotations only, without model builder?
I have two stored procedures that return a slightly different set of columns. I have a separate ComplexType defined to manage each of the result types.
I recently updated a computed column to be persisted due to poor performance when querying it. However now updates to child records throw this error
I have some views that I want to use EF 4.1 to query. These are specific optimized views that will not have keys to speak of; there will be no deletions, updates, just good ol\'e select.
This is probably just because my knowledge with the EF Code First fluent API is lacking, but I\'m stumped.
Confusing Situation I have a situation where I have 2 entities where 1 inherits from the other, that need to map to 2 separate tables, but code use should be around the base of the 2 entities.
加载中,请稍侯......