Consider the 2 alternative lines: modelBuilder.Entity<CommissionStructure>().HasMany(c => c.CommissionUnits).WithOptional().WillCascadeOnDelete(true);
I\'m working on a small sample project using Entity Framework 4.1 (code first).My classes look like this:
I\'ve encountered what seems to be a common problem: I am updating values in my database, but EF is using its original in-memory copy of the object and these changed values are not reflected in the di
I\'m using EF 4.1 RC Code first. I have a many to man开发者_Python百科y relation working with a composite PK in the junction table Friends. We explicitly need a separate Friends class (don\'t ask) whi
I would like to implement a simple WPF with a datagrid and a save button. when I click save button it will accept changes (row edit,cell edit, new row, delete etc)
I have a database called ApplicationName_Development running on SQL Server 2008 R2 Developer edition on my development box.
I would like to enable CASCADE DELETE on a table using code-first. When the model is re-created from scratch, there is no CASCADE DELETE set even though the relationships are set-up automatically. The
I\'m using the new EF code first to one project of mine, and i\'m getting a weird error, my mode is: abstract class Member
Using the code-first approach available in the new 4.1 RC. Is there any way to persist the current data stored in a database when the mode changes? The database is created by the entity framework, an
The method -Entity Framework Code-First -looks good. But its very difficult to create all the classes for a large database.
加载中,请稍侯......