Given that some of the advice for implementing CQRS advocates fairly close-to-the-metal query implementation, such as ADO.NET queries directly against the database (or perhaps a LINQ-based ORM), is it
I recently started investigating CQRS and DDD for a green field project that I\'m about to start. I studied a great deal of material from Udi Dahan, Greg Young, Mark Nijhof and others. These were real
I have been reading up on CQRS and find many of the principles to be valuable. However, I have one major point of contention. Many people talk about having the read model queries map directly to view
Been watching some Greg Young videos lately and I\'m trying to understand why there is a negative attitude towards Setters on Domain objects开发者_开发技巧. I thought Domain objects were supposed to b
My question is related to CQRS (Command and Query Responsibility Segregation) and mechanism that builds read model (views). As far as I understand read model is built by event handlers. These handlers
My team is beginning implementation of a greenfield application, with a requirement for multi-tenancy.I have 开发者_StackOverflow中文版been doing a large amount of research on patterns for simple scal
Does anyone use ElasticSearch for building read model in CQRS approach? I have some questions related to such solution:
I follow the discussion about cqrs a long time now. Something that occured to me, is that the programming language of choice is mostly settled in the dot.Net world.
I\'m still struggling with what must be basic (and resolved) issues related to CQRS style architecture:
I have a Java generics question I was hoping someone could answer. Consider the following code: public interface Event{}